mirror of
https://github.com/google/nomulus.git
synced 2025-04-30 12:07:51 +02:00
Add Registrar FAQ document
------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136765156
This commit is contained in:
parent
fd1c68ffb9
commit
975f574256
1 changed files with 525 additions and 0 deletions
525
docs/registrar-faq.md
Normal file
525
docs/registrar-faq.md
Normal file
|
@ -0,0 +1,525 @@
|
||||||
|
# FAQ for talking to registrars
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This document contains some of the questions that registrars are likely to ask
|
||||||
|
about the system. In most cases, the question can be answered generally for
|
||||||
|
Nomulus systems. In some cases, the details depend on things outside the scope
|
||||||
|
of Nomulus, such as EPP and WHOIS proxies and DNS systems.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Technical onboarding
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**1.1 Do you provide a web based interface for registrars to manage domain names
|
||||||
|
(URL)?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
There is no web based interface to manage domains at this time; registrars must
|
||||||
|
use EPP commands.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**1.2 Will a Registrar Tool Kit be made available? If yes, what is included in
|
||||||
|
the Tool Kit?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Registry has provided this technical FAQ documentation on how to use the core
|
||||||
|
EPP protocols and supported extensions. An EPP SDK is not provided. The
|
||||||
|
registrar can develop EPP client using any existing EPP client libraries (e.g.
|
||||||
|
Verisign, Afilias, or any Open Source variants).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**1.3 Does the registry provide a secure certificate? Are multiple
|
||||||
|
certifications required across gTLDs?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answer to this question depends on the details of your EPP proxy
|
||||||
|
implementation. Here is how we answer it: ]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The registry does not provide a secure certificate. Registrars must provide
|
||||||
|
their own certificate during onboarding, which will be whitelisted for the
|
||||||
|
connection. A single certificate can be used for multiple TLDs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**1.4 Locks and statuses: do lock and status rules follow RFC specifications?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, lock and status rules follow RFC specifications.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**1.5 How can we receive the registry zone file (SFTP, web-based download)?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The zone file is available by requesting through ICANN’s [Centralized Zone Data
|
||||||
|
Service](https://czds.icann.org).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Domain names
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**2.1 Are second level IDNs supported?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For open TLDs launched by Registry, Latin script (which includes all Spanish
|
||||||
|
alphabet characters) and the Kanji, Hiragana, and Katakana scripts are supported
|
||||||
|
at the second level. Please refer to the IDN tables on [IANA
|
||||||
|
website](http://www.iana.org/domains/idn-tables) for the list of IDNs supported
|
||||||
|
for each specific TLD.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**2.2 Are variants of the domain name allowed?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For IDNs that contain variants, we will block them. However, the two tables that
|
||||||
|
we currently support (Japanese and Latin) do not have variants.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**2.3 Will the life cycle for IDNs v. ASCII differ?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, the restrictions for an IDN domain are the same as those for an ASCII
|
||||||
|
domain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**2.4 Is NDN (for example, 1234.tld) allowed for registration?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes. Numeric Domain Names are allowed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**2.5 What are the restrictions on the length of a domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A second level domain can be any length up to 15 characters if it contains any
|
||||||
|
Japanese codepoints, or 63 characters if it only contains ASCII or Latin script
|
||||||
|
codepoints.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## DNSSEC
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**3.1 What version of DNSSEC is being implemented? Will it be supported at
|
||||||
|
launch?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
EPP DNSSEC extension version 1.1 is supported at launch.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**3.2 What is the specification for transmitting DNSSEC data to the registry?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
RFC 5910 defines the specification for sending DNSSEC data to the registry.
|
||||||
|
Specifically, Registry accepts dsData.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**3.3 Are DNSSEC nameservers pre-checked for DNSSEC data?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, DNSSEC nameservers are not be pre-checked for DNSSEC data.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**3.4 What are the valid algorithm values for a DS record?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We do not validate DS records, so any value is accepted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**3.5 Is the maxSigLife attribute enabled?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, the maxSigLife attribute is not supported.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**3.6 What is the maximum number of DNSSEC records allowed per domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A maximum of eight DNSSEC records are allowed per domain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Nameservers
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.1 Do you support host objects or host attributes for the domain:ns tag?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Registry supports host objects. Host attributes are not supported.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.2 Are there any restrictions on the length of the host?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We do not impose any additional restrictions, except those required by DNS.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.3 What number of nameservers are required in order for a domain to
|
||||||
|
resolve?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
One nameserver is required for a domain name to resolve.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.4 Does the registry support renaming of host objects?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, Registry supports the renaming of host objects.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.5 Can hosts be updated by their owner when the host is linked to another
|
||||||
|
domain name?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, hosts can be updated when the host is linked to another domain name.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.6 Can domains be deleted when a subordinate host object of the domain is
|
||||||
|
being used as a nameserver by another domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, domains cannot be deleted while they still contain subordinate host objects.
|
||||||
|
However, you can delete the hosts, or rename them so they are no longer
|
||||||
|
subordinate, and then the domain can be deleted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.7 Is it required to have a zone configuration verified by the registry prior
|
||||||
|
to the registration of a domain name or a domain update?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, we do not require verification of zone configurations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.8 Are IPv6 addresses supported?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, IPv6 addresses are supported.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.9 How many IP adresses can be listed on an in-bailiwick host object?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Ten IP addresses can be listed on an in-bailiwick host object. This limit is for
|
||||||
|
both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses combined.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.10 Can duplicate IP addresses be listed within a host object?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
While duplicate IP addresses can be set on a host object, they will be de-duped
|
||||||
|
prior to persisting, so there is no point in listing duplicate IP addresses.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.11 Can duplicate IP addresses be listed between different host objects for
|
||||||
|
the same domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, duplicate IP addresses can be listed between different host objects for the
|
||||||
|
same domain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.12 How many nameservers can be set on a domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Thirteen nameservers can be set on a domain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.13 Do you allow the usage of glue nameservers?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We require IP address information for nameservers subordinate to a TLD, and do
|
||||||
|
not allow it otherwise.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.14 What is your procedure for the handling of Orphan Glue Records?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We do not have a procedure for the handling of Orphan Glue records because we
|
||||||
|
will not have Orphan Glue Records. When a host object is no longer referred to
|
||||||
|
by any domain, its glue is removed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**4.15 What are the authoritative domain name servers for Registry TLDs?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answer to this question will depend on your DNS implementation. ]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Contacts
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**5.1 What contacts are required to register a domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
A registrant, administrative, and technical contact are required to register a
|
||||||
|
domain. A billing contact is not required. An abuse contact will be required
|
||||||
|
beginning in 2017, as per ICANN directive. All contacts may point at the same
|
||||||
|
contact ID. Note that multiple contacts of the same type are not allowed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**5.2 Can contact information be updated at anytime without a fee?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, contact information can be updated at any time without a fee.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**5.3 Are proxy contacts allowed on the domain?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, proxy contacts are allowed on the domain.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**5.4 Do contact attributes follow the RFC standard?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, contact attributes follow the RFC standard.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**5.5 Are ISO country codes used?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, ISO country codes are used.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**5.6 Is a transfer of Contacts possible?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, contacts may be transferred.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## WHOIS
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**6.1 What is the URL and port number for WHOIS requests?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answer to this question will depend on your WHOIS proxy implementation.
|
||||||
|
]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**6.2 Does your policy allow WHOIS Privacy?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Whois Privacy is allowed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**6.3 Is a Bulk WHOIS available?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, Bulk WHOIS is not available.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**6.4 What are the WHOIS rate limitations?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answer to this question will depend on your WHOIS proxy implementation.
|
||||||
|
]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**6.5 How often is WHOIS information updated?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
WHOIS is updated in near real time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## EPP - General
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.1 What is your EPP server address?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answer to this question will depend on your EPP proxy implementation. ]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.2 Will you provide a standard Pool and Batch account (e.g. as VeriSign)?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, we will not provide a standard Pool and Batch account.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.3 Does the registry support thick domain registrations?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, Registry supports thick domain registrations.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.4 What EPP commands exist to retrieve the account balance of the
|
||||||
|
registrar?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
None at the current time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.5 Are there any restrictions on the volume of commands allowed during a
|
||||||
|
session?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, there are no restriction on the volume of commands allowed during a session.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.6 Are you using special extensions for your EPP API?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Launch Phase
|
||||||
|
Mapping](http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-eppext-launchphase-01) and
|
||||||
|
Registry Fee Extension (versions 0.6 and 0.11, as described below) are
|
||||||
|
supported.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.7 Which domain status are allowed for the domains?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Standard EPP statuses are allowed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.8 Do you use a real-time or non real-time registration system?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Registry uses a real-time registration system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.9 What are your connection policies to the registry system (e.g., how many
|
||||||
|
connections are allowed)?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answer to this question will depend on your App Engine configuration. ]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.10 Are you using a Shared Registry System or a Dedicated Registry System
|
||||||
|
(separate EPP servers for each TLD)?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We have a shared registry system for EPP, with a shared namespace across all
|
||||||
|
supported TLDs. Contacts and hosts are shared across all TLDs; for instance, the
|
||||||
|
same contact can be used for all of a registrar's domains in the system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.11 If using a DRS, are login credentials, IP whitelisting, etc. configured
|
||||||
|
separately or will these be the same for all TLDs in your system?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These will be the same for all TLDs, because we are a shared registry system.
|
||||||
|
There is a single login regardless of TLD, and the same login session can be
|
||||||
|
used to send EPP commands for all TLDs.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.12 What types of signed marks do you accept for sunrise applications?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We only accept encoded signed marks that are signed by the TMCH. Non-encoded
|
||||||
|
signed marks are not supported.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.13 Where do I get encoded signed marks to use during the OT&E process?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You can use any of the active test SMDs provided by ICANN, which can be found by
|
||||||
|
following the link in [this ICANN PDF
|
||||||
|
document](http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/smd-test-repository-02oct13-en.pdf).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.14 How do I specify the EPP launch phases (i.e. Sunrise and Landrush)?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For applications during the Sunrise phase, the launch phase should be specified
|
||||||
|
as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`<launch:phase>sunrise</launch:phase>`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For applications during the Landrush phase, the launch phase should be specified
|
||||||
|
as follows:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`<launch:phase>landrush</launch:phase>`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.15 Do you accept domain labels with upper-case characters?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
No, the registry will reject domain labels with any uppercase characters. While
|
||||||
|
DNS labels are inherently case-insensitive
|
||||||
|
([RFC4343](http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc4343)), we ask registrars to
|
||||||
|
canonicalize to lowercase to avoid confusion matching up labels on EPP responses
|
||||||
|
and poll messages.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.16 When should I run a claims check?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Claims checks are required during the General Availability and Landrush periods
|
||||||
|
for domains matching a label existing in the TMCH claims database. Otherwise,
|
||||||
|
the registration/application will be rejected. Claims checks are not allowed
|
||||||
|
during Sunrise.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.17 How can I get the claims notice from TMDB using the TCNID?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Section 3.1 of [this ICANN PDF
|
||||||
|
document](http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/scsvcs/db-registrar-06dec13-en.pdf)
|
||||||
|
provides an overview of how you can access the TMDB system.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.18 What happens if I send an explicit renew command during the auto-renew
|
||||||
|
grace period?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If an explicit renewal command is sent through during the auto-renew grace
|
||||||
|
period, it will be in addition to the auto-renew and further extend the
|
||||||
|
expiration date (not overrule the auto-renew).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note however that this is not the case for transfers; a transfer during the
|
||||||
|
auto-renew grace period overrules the auto-renew.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.19 What testing environments are available to registrars on sandbox?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
In addition to the existing registrar-specific OTE EPP accounts and TLDs, we
|
||||||
|
provide a production-like development environment. All registrars are able to
|
||||||
|
use their OTE GA accounts to access the development versions of the TLDs they
|
||||||
|
have been onboarded for.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
These development TLDs can be accessed at:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* EPP hostname: *[ this depends on your EPP proxy implementation ]*
|
||||||
|
* Using OTE EPP accounts: `<registrarid>-3` and `<registrarid>-4`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**7.20 When using the Verisign EPP Tool to test access to the registry, I see
|
||||||
|
an "Error Reading Server Greeting" message.**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is usually the result of the connection being terminated by the server
|
||||||
|
because no security certificate is present. The EPP Tool's Getting Started Guide
|
||||||
|
describes how to configure the connection profile to include a certificate using
|
||||||
|
the ssl.\* parameters. A certificate is required in order to connect to
|
||||||
|
the registry.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## EPP - Fee extension
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.1 Which version of the Fee Extension draft do you support?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We currently support two versions of the Registry Fee Extension:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:fee-0.6](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-brown-epp-fees-03)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:fee-0.11](https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-epp-fees-00)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Note that the version of the specification document is not the same as the
|
||||||
|
version of the fee extension URI itself. Also, version 0.11 is still in the
|
||||||
|
process of being finalized, so for the moment, version 0.6 is to be preferred.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.2 Where is the Fee Extension supported?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fee extension is supported in the OT&E sandbox and in the production
|
||||||
|
environment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.3 How do I use the Fee Extension?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Declare the fee extension in the `<login>` command:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
`<extURI>urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:fee-0.6</extURI>`
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Use of the fee extension is optional for EPP query commands. If the client
|
||||||
|
request includes the fee extension, fee information will be included in the
|
||||||
|
server response. By policy, the registry will return an error from `<check>`
|
||||||
|
if you attempt to check the fee of a domain that you are not also checking
|
||||||
|
the availability of.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* On non-premium domains, the fee extension is not required to perform EPP
|
||||||
|
transform commands (e.g. `<domain:create>` , `<domain:transfer>`, etc).
|
||||||
|
However, for premium domains, the client is required to acknowledge the
|
||||||
|
price of an EPP transform operation through the use of the extension. If the
|
||||||
|
fee extension is not included in transform commands on premium names, the
|
||||||
|
server will respond with an error.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.4 Do you return different "premium" tiers?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We do not have different premium tiers. If a domain name is premium, we
|
||||||
|
communicate "premium" as a single class in the EPP response, regardless of the
|
||||||
|
domain’s price range.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.5 What do you do with the "grace-period", "applied" and "refundable"
|
||||||
|
attributes as added in draft 0.6 of the Fee Extension?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Registry does not return any of those fields, and will reject any transform
|
||||||
|
commands that attempt to pass in those fields.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.6 What currency code do I use for the Fee Extension?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The value for `<fee:currency>` depends on the currency we use for billing the
|
||||||
|
specific TLD.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.7 Do you support balance check in the Fee Extension?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Currently we do not support it.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.8 How can I try the Fee Extension in the sandbox?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ We recommend that you set up a dummy premium list in the sandbox environment
|
||||||
|
with special names that you can give out to registrars for testing purposes. For
|
||||||
|
instance, we use the following SLD names, with different associated premium
|
||||||
|
prices: "rich", "richer", "silver", "iridium", "gold", "platinum", "rhodium",
|
||||||
|
"diamond", "palladium", "aluminum", "copper" and "brass". ]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Trying to create premium names without using the fee extension will return an
|
||||||
|
error. The accepted value for `<fee:currency>` in sandbox is USD.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.9 What if I don’t want to carry premium domains?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The fee extension is required to execute transform operations on premium
|
||||||
|
domains. If you do not declare the fee extension during login, you will not be
|
||||||
|
able to Create, Delete, Transfer, or Restore premium domains. All operations on
|
||||||
|
non-premium domains, as well as Check and Info on premiums, will still be
|
||||||
|
allowed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
To summarise, here is the expected EPP response if you do not declare the fee
|
||||||
|
extension during login:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* `<domain:check>` on a non-premium domain will return "*avail=true*" or
|
||||||
|
"*avail=false*" depending on the availability of the domain.
|
||||||
|
* `<domain:check>` on a premium domain will always return "*avail=false*". If
|
||||||
|
the domain is already registered, the reason code will be "*In Use*",
|
||||||
|
otherwise it will be "*Premium names require EPP ext.*"
|
||||||
|
* `<fee:check>` and other fee extension commands should result in a "*2002 -
|
||||||
|
Command use error*" response code since the fee extension is not declared
|
||||||
|
during login.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.10 Why do I get an error when using `<fee:command phase="sunrise">`?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Prices are the same across all phases, so it is not necessary to specify any
|
||||||
|
command phases or subphases.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.11 Why do I get a "2103: Unimplemented Extension" error when trying to
|
||||||
|
include fee and claim extensions in the same `<domain:check>` command?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Fee and claim checks are not allowed in the same `<domain:check>` command.The
|
||||||
|
[Launch
|
||||||
|
Phase](http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tan-epp-launchphase-12#section-3.1)
|
||||||
|
extension defines two types of domain checks: availability checks and claim
|
||||||
|
checks. The `<fee:check>` command is only allowed in availability check
|
||||||
|
commands.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**8.12 What are your Grace and Pending Period durations?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
* Add - 5 days
|
||||||
|
* Renew - 5 days
|
||||||
|
* Transfer - 5 days
|
||||||
|
* Pending Delete - 5 days
|
||||||
|
* Sunrise and Landrush Add/Drop - 30 days
|
||||||
|
* Redemption - 30 days
|
||||||
|
* Auto-Renew - 45 days
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Security
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
*[ The answers in this section depend on your EPP proxy implementation. These
|
||||||
|
are the answers that we give, because our EPP proxy has IP whitelists, and
|
||||||
|
requires SSL certificates and SNI. We recommend that other proxy implementations
|
||||||
|
do likewise. ]*
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**9.1 How do I specify the IP addresses that can access your EPP system?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You will be asked to submit your whitelisted IPs (in CIDR notation) during the
|
||||||
|
onboarding process. After completion of the onboarding process, you can use the
|
||||||
|
support console to manage the IP whitelist for your production account.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**9.2 What SSL certificates will you accept for EPP connections?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We will accept any SSL certificate. You will be asked to submit your certificate
|
||||||
|
for whitelisting during the onboarding process. After completion of the
|
||||||
|
onboarding process, you can use the support console to manage the certificate
|
||||||
|
for your production account.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**9.3 Is the use of SNI (Server Name Indication) required when connecting to the
|
||||||
|
EPP endpoint?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Yes, the use of SNI is required.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
**9.4 Is SNI supported in Java?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The default SSL implementation in the current OpenJDK is the Java Secure Socket
|
||||||
|
Extension (JSSE) from Sun, which does support SNI. However, it can be somewhat
|
||||||
|
tricky to enable, as it may depend on which method you use to connect. If you
|
||||||
|
call `SSLSocketFactory.createSocket(...)` and pass in the host directly, it will
|
||||||
|
use SNI; however, if you call `SSLSocketFactory.createSocket()` and then
|
||||||
|
subsequently call `connect(...)` on the resultant `Socket` object, then it may
|
||||||
|
not use SNI. In that case, you may have to cast the socket to its actual
|
||||||
|
implementation and call `setHost(...)` on it directly. Please refer to the
|
||||||
|
following code snippet for illustration:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
```java
|
||||||
|
SSLContext sslContext = SSLContext.getInstance("TLSv1");
|
||||||
|
SSLSocketFactory sslSocketFactory = sslContext.getSocketFactory();
|
||||||
|
SSLSocket sslSocket = (SSLSocket) sslSocketFactory.createSocket();
|
||||||
|
if (sslSocket instanceof sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl) {
|
||||||
|
((sun.security.ssl.SSLSocketImpl) sslSocket).setHost(server);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
socket.connect(new InetSocketAddress(server, port), timeout);
|
||||||
|
```
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
We recommend that registrars use Java7 or later, as they have native SNI
|
||||||
|
support, unlike previous versions of the JDK.
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue