mirror of
https://github.com/google/nomulus.git
synced 2025-05-01 12:37:52 +02:00
This eliminates the use of Objectify polymorphism for EPP resources entirely (yay!), which makes the Registry 3.0 database migration easier. It is unfortunate that the naming parallelism of EppResources is lost between ContactResource, HostResource, and DomainResource, but the actual type as far as Datastore was concerned was DomainBase all along, and it would be a much more substantial data migration to allow us to continue using the class name DomainResource now that we're no longer using Objectify polymorphism. This simply isn't worth it. This also removes the polymorphic Datastore indexes (which will no longer function as of this change). The non-polymorphic replacement indexes were added in [] ------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=230930546
83 lines
2.9 KiB
Java
83 lines
2.9 KiB
Java
// Copyright 2017 The Nomulus Authors. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
//
|
|
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
//
|
|
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
//
|
|
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
// limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
package google.registry.tools;
|
|
|
|
import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState;
|
|
import static google.registry.model.ofy.ObjectifyService.ofy;
|
|
|
|
import com.beust.jcommander.Parameter;
|
|
import com.beust.jcommander.Parameters;
|
|
import google.registry.model.domain.DomainBase;
|
|
import google.registry.model.registrar.Registrar;
|
|
import google.registry.model.registry.Registry;
|
|
import google.registry.model.registry.Registry.TldType;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Command to delete the {@link Registry} associated with the specified TLD in Datastore.
|
|
*
|
|
* <p>This command will fail if any domains are currently registered on the TLD.
|
|
*/
|
|
@Parameters(separators = " =", commandDescription = "Delete a TLD from Datastore.")
|
|
final class DeleteTldCommand extends ConfirmingCommand implements CommandWithRemoteApi {
|
|
|
|
private Registry registry;
|
|
|
|
@Parameter(
|
|
names = {"-t", "--tld"},
|
|
description = "The TLD to delete.",
|
|
required = true)
|
|
private String tld;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Perform the command by deleting the TLD.
|
|
*
|
|
* <p>Note that this uses an eventually consistent query, so theoretically, if you create a TLD,
|
|
* create domains on it, then delete the TLD quickly enough, the code won't notice the domains,
|
|
* and will let you delete the TLD. Since this command is only intended to be used in cleanup
|
|
* tasks, that should be ok, and the check should always provide the desired safety against
|
|
* accidental deletion of established TLDs with domains on them.
|
|
*/
|
|
@Override
|
|
protected void init() {
|
|
registry = Registry.get(tld);
|
|
checkState(registry.getTldType().equals(TldType.TEST), "Cannot delete a real TLD");
|
|
|
|
for (Registrar registrar : Registrar.loadAll()) {
|
|
checkState(
|
|
!registrar.getAllowedTlds().contains(tld),
|
|
"Cannot delete TLD because registrar %s lists it as an allowed TLD",
|
|
registrar.getClientId());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
int count = ofy().load()
|
|
.type(DomainBase.class)
|
|
.filter("tld", tld)
|
|
.limit(1)
|
|
.count();
|
|
checkState(count == 0, "Cannot delete TLD because a domain is defined on it");
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Override
|
|
protected String prompt() {
|
|
return "You are about to delete TLD: " + tld;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Override
|
|
protected String execute() {
|
|
ofy().transactNew(() -> ofy().delete().entity(registry).now());
|
|
registry.invalidateInCache();
|
|
return String.format("Deleted TLD '%s'.\n", tld);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|