google-nomulus/javatests/google/registry/model/index/DomainApplicationIndexTest.java
larryruili 3d5a6b808c Change loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName to non-transactional
We can easily end up enlisting too many entity groups (separate
DomainApplications) in a TransactionalFlow when loading all applications
tracked by the DomainApplicationIndex. This makes the load operation
transactionless, to avoid overenlisting.

Potential problems:
1. We fail to prevent landrush applications, if a single sunrise application
exists. This is likely fine, except for a brief moment in Sunrush when a
sunrise application is made immediately prior to a landrush application. The
result is we accept an invalid application- which can be mediated manually.

2. We fail to prevent a domain create for a domain with an open application.
This is a little more sinister, but also unlikely unless someone submits an
application immediately before someone tries to create the same domain (sans
application?)

3. We return an invalid DomainCheck response (instead of 'pending allocation').
Not the worst outcome.

4. We reduce the AuctionStatusCommand and GetApplicationIdsCommand to
eventual consistency. Since they're internal tools, that's not too big a deal.

A better solution:
DomainApplications really should just be normalized under a virtualEntityGroup
by fullyQualifiedDomainName, or a hash-bucket like EppResources are. The
DomainApplication -> DomainBase -> EppResource hierarchy seems to be purely for
code reuse, at the cost of Datastore consistency. This would, however, require
quite some refactoring, and a custom resave operation across all
DomainApplications.

-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=169395586
2017-10-04 16:16:44 -04:00

142 lines
6.3 KiB
Java

// Copyright 2017 The Nomulus Authors. All Rights Reserved.
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package google.registry.model.index;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import static google.registry.model.index.DomainApplicationIndex.createUpdatedInstance;
import static google.registry.model.index.DomainApplicationIndex.createWithSpecifiedKeys;
import static google.registry.model.index.DomainApplicationIndex.loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName;
import static google.registry.model.ofy.ObjectifyService.ofy;
import static google.registry.testing.DatastoreHelper.createTld;
import static google.registry.testing.DatastoreHelper.newDomainApplication;
import static google.registry.testing.DatastoreHelper.persistResource;
import static google.registry.testing.DatastoreHelper.persistSimpleResource;
import static org.joda.time.DateTimeZone.UTC;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
import com.googlecode.objectify.Key;
import com.googlecode.objectify.VoidWork;
import google.registry.model.EntityTestCase;
import google.registry.model.domain.DomainApplication;
import google.registry.testing.ExceptionRule;
import org.joda.time.DateTime;
import org.junit.Before;
import org.junit.Rule;
import org.junit.Test;
/** Unit tests for {@link DomainApplicationIndex}. */
public class DomainApplicationIndexTest extends EntityTestCase {
@Rule
public final ExceptionRule thrown = new ExceptionRule();
@Before
public void init() throws Exception {
createTld("com");
}
@Test
public void testFailure_create_nullReferences() {
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Keys must not be null or empty.");
DomainApplicationIndex.createWithSpecifiedKeys("blah.com", null);
}
@Test
public void testFailure_create_emptyReferences() {
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Keys must not be null or empty.");
createWithSpecifiedKeys("blah.com", ImmutableSet.<Key<DomainApplication>>of());
}
@Test
public void testSuccess_singleApplication() {
DomainApplication application = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application));
DomainApplicationIndex savedIndex = DomainApplicationIndex.load("example.com");
assertThat(savedIndex).isNotNull();
assertThat(savedIndex.getKeys()).containsExactly(Key.create(application));
assertThat(loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName("example.com", clock.nowUtc()))
.containsExactly(application);
}
@Test
public void testSuccess_noApplications() {
assertThat(DomainApplicationIndex.load("example.com")).isNull();
assertThat(loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName("example.com", clock.nowUtc())).isEmpty();
}
@Test
public void testSuccess_multipleApplications() {
DomainApplication application1 = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
DomainApplication application2 = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
DomainApplication application3 = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application1));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application2));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application3));
DomainApplicationIndex savedIndex = DomainApplicationIndex.load("example.com");
assertThat(savedIndex).isNotNull();
assertThat(savedIndex.getKeys()).containsExactly(
Key.create(application1), Key.create(application2), Key.create(application3));
assertThat(loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName("example.com", clock.nowUtc()))
.containsExactly(application1, application2, application3);
}
@Test
public void testSuccess_doesntStoreSameApplicationMultipleTimes() {
DomainApplication application1 = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
DomainApplication application2 = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application1));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application2));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application1));
assertThat(loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName("example.com", clock.nowUtc()))
.containsExactly(application1, application2);
}
@Test
public void testSuccess_doesntIncludePastApplications() {
DomainApplication application1 = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
DomainApplication application2 =
persistSimpleResource(
newDomainApplication("example.com")
.asBuilder()
.setDeletionTime(DateTime.now(UTC).minusDays(30))
.build());
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application1));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application2));
DomainApplicationIndex savedIndex =
DomainApplicationIndex.load(application1.getFullyQualifiedDomainName());
assertThat(savedIndex.getKeys()).hasSize(2);
assertThat(loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName("example.com", DateTime.now(UTC)))
.containsExactly(application1);
}
/** Ensure loading over 25 applications still succeeds (despite being in a transaction.) */
@Test
public void testSuccess_overCrossTransactionLimit() {
ImmutableList.Builder<DomainApplication> applicationsBuilder = new ImmutableList.Builder<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 30; i++) {
DomainApplication application = persistSimpleResource(newDomainApplication("example.com"));
persistResource(createUpdatedInstance(application));
applicationsBuilder.add(application);
}
ofy().transact(new VoidWork() {
@Override
public void vrun() {
assertThat(DomainApplicationIndex.load("example.com")).isNotNull();
assertThat(loadActiveApplicationsByDomainName("example.com", clock.nowUtc()))
.containsExactlyElementsIn(applicationsBuilder.build());
}});
}
}