This also removes the related setting on the Registry entity. We never used
either of these, and keeping them around in our codebase just adds complexity
for no purpose. We already achieve the goals of this feature by restricting
nameservers on entire TLDs and by registry-locking important domain names.
This is also two fewer things we'll have to worry about carrying over to the new
schema in Registry 3.0.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=243816241
Note that this gets rid of anchor tenant codes in reserved lists (yay!), which
are no longer valid. They have to come from allocation tokens now.
This removes support for LRP from domain application create flow (that's fine,
we never used it and I'm going to delete all of LRP later). It also uses
allocation tokens from EPP authcodes as a fallback, for now, but that will be
removed later once we switch fully to the allocation token mechanism.
This doesn't yet allow registration of RESERVED_FOR_SPECIFIC_USE domains using
the allocation token extension; that will come in the next CL. Ditto for
showing these reserved domains as available on domain checks when the allocation
token is specified.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=209019617
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
Memcache is already off but now it's not in the code anymore.
This includes removing domain creation failfast, since that is actually
slower now than just running the flow - all you gain is a non-transactional
read over a transactional read, but the cost is that you always pay that
read, which is going to drive up latency.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=158183506
This is a follow-up to Lai's refactoring of the get reservation types
code to return a set rather than a single type. Since we're always
returning a set now, the more natural way to represent a label that is
not reserved is to return an empty set rather than a set containing
UNRESERVED.
Also fixes some minor style issues I ran across regarding static
importing and test method naming that I ran across (no logic
implications).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=151132116
A new field (allowedNameservers) is added to ReservedListEntry that stores the allow nameservers for the label. The field itself is a comma separated string, but the actual lines within a reserved list file (from which the field is parsed) uses colon to separate nameservers, to avoid conflicting with the commas used as primary separators in a CSV file.
Combined with upcoming update(s) that enables locking down an entire TLD to only delegate domains with a nameserver restricted reservation type, this change will enable us to restrict domain delegation to nameservers specifically specified in the allowed nameservers list, in order to prevent malicious delegation in case the registrar for a brand TLD is compromised.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149989330
This CL defines metrics for both premium and reserved lists, but actually uses only the reserved list metrics. The premium list metrics will be used in a future CL.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149982639
Instead of only returning the most severe one, return all applicable ones. This is because the reserved list has grown to a list of types that are not strictly comparable but orthogonal to each other. We can no longer depend on the fact that the most severe type incorporates all properties of those beneath it. Therefore returning all of them and treat them one by one in the calling site is the correct behavior.
Due to constraint imposed in eppcom.xsd, during domain checks the response can only contain a reservation reason of fewer than 32 characters, therefore we are returning the message for the type with highest severity, in case of multiple reservation types for a label.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149776106
This primarily addresses issues with TMCH testing mode and email sending utils.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143710550
It wasn't being used by any actual code, and having helper methods handling
saving/persistence on entities like this is not a pattern we want to encourage,
since it hides Datastore transactions from further up in the call chain. The
idea is that you can always look for ofy() calls in the same layer of code to
see where persisted data is being changed.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143036027
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/model/registry/label/ReservedList.java (Browse further)
