It's best to be consistent and use the same thing everywhere. "clientId" was
already used in more places and is shorter and no more ambiguous, so it's the
logical one to win out.
Note that this CL is almost solely a big Eclipse-assisted refactoring. There are
two places that I did not change clientIdentifier -- the actual entity field on
Registrar (though I did change all getters and setters), and the name of a
column on the exported registrar spreadsheet. Both would require data
migrations.
Also fixes a few minor nits discovered in touched files, including an incorrect
test in OfyFilterTest.java and some superfluous uses of String.format() when
calling checkArgument().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133956465
Per mcilwain's suggestion in the LRP design doc, LRP tokens should use a Base58 alphabet. I'll move PasswordGenerator out of the tools package and into a utils class in a future CL, as we'll want to use this generator in the LrpToken class itself rather than relegate the token definition to a tool.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132358363
This refactors the existing premium list functionality into the new
class StaticPremiumListPricingEngine, which implements PricingEngine.
A backfill @OnLoad is provided to default existing Registry entities
into the static implementation. For now there is just this one
implementation. Dagger map multibinding is used to generate the total
set of allowed pricing engines, and allows other parties to plug in
their own implementations.
The pricing engine is a required field on the Registry object. If you
don't want a particular Registry to actually have a premium list, then
use the static pricing engine but don't actually set a premium list.
A subsequent CL will refactor the Key<PremiumList> field on the
Registry entity class to be handled solely by the
StaticPremiumListPricingEngine implementation. Going forward, all
configuration and implementation details that are specific to a given
pricing engine should be handled by that pricing engine, and not as
fields on the Registry object.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=121850176
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/tools/CreateAnchorTenantCommand.java (Browse further)
