This removes the following unnecessary imports:
//third_party/java/activation
//third_party/java/bouncycastle
//third_party/java/bouncycastle_bcpg
//third_party/java/dagger
//third_party/java/dnsjava
//third_party/java/jaxws_api
//third_party/java/jcommander
//third_party/java/joda_money
//third_party/java/joda_time
//third_party/java/json_simple
//third_party/java/junit
//third_party/java/mockito
//third_party/java/re2j
//third_party/java/servlet/servlet_api
//third_party/java/truth:truth8
The exact command run to generate this CL was:
build_cleaner '//third_party/java_src/gtld/...' -c '' --dep_restrictions='//third_party/java/activation,//third_party/java/bouncycastle,//third_party/java/bouncycastle_bcpg,//third_party/java/dagger,//third_party/java/dnsjava,//third_party/java/jaxws_api,//third_party/java/jcommander,//third_party/java/joda_money,//third_party/java/joda_time,//third_party/java/json_simple,//third_party/java/junit,//third_party/java/mockito,//third_party/java/re2j,//third_party/java/servlet/servlet_api,//third_party/java/truth:truth8'
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=202344774
This is in preparation for running the automatic refactoring script that
will replace all ExpectedExceptions with use of JUnit 4.13's assertThrows/
expectThrows.
Note that I have recorded the callsites of assertions about EppExceptions
being marshallable and will edit those specific assertions back in after
running the automatic refactoring script (which do not understand these).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=178812403
The only remaining methods on ExceptionRule after this are methods that
also exist on ExpectedException, which will allow us to, in the next CL,
swap out the one for the other and then run the automated refactoring to
turn it all into assertThrows/expectThrows.
Note that there were some assertions about root causes that couldn't
easily be turned into ExpectedException invocations, so I simply
converted them directly to usages of assertThrows/expectThrows.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=178623431
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
We already had methods to return just the create or just the renew price. I added more to return just the premium flag or just the fee class.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136833071
This CL enhances various domain flows (check, create, delete, renew, restore, transfer, update) so that they invoke the appropriate methods on the object implementing the TLD's RegistryExtraFlowLogic (if any). TldSpecificLogicProxy is also updated to invoke RegistryExtraFlowLogic proxy (if any) to fetch the appropriate price. The tests use a made-up extra flow logic object which can be attached to a test TLD to make sure that the proper routines are being invoked.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132486734
When EAP is involed we current have one billing event for domain create that
has the create fee and EAP fee lumped together. Change it to record two
separate billing events for each.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132335349
This is better than the previous way of using the canonical name of the class,
because the previous way did not allow for refactoring, and also required the
PremiumPricingEngine to live in the model package lest there be circular
dependencies, which does not seem ideal.
Note that, for reasons of backwards compatibility with existing persisted data,
the name of the static premium pricing engine has been set to its canonical
class name, but the class can now be refactored going forward so long as this
string remains unchanged, and any new pricing engine implementations can use
whatever string key they want (it doesn't have to be a canonical class name).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=129215185
This new name is a more accurate description of what the actual class
does. TldSpecificLogicEngine is an interface that will be added in
the near future, implementations of which will provide custom per-TLD
logic. The class being renamed is more properly a proxy that only
handles logic generic to all TLDs.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=127088913
"EppCommandSpecializer" generates a price compositor for exposing a set of fees to the higher level flow logic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=125082714
This properly reflects the fact that other, separate things will now
be responsible both for EAP and for per-TLD custom pricing.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=124558165
ReferenceUnion is a hack to work around the mismatch between how
we store references (by roid) and how they are represented in EPP
(by foreign key). If it ever needed to exist (not entirely clear...)
it should have remained tightly scoped within the domain commands
and resources. Instead it has leaked everywhere in the project,
causing lots of boilerplate. This CL hides all of that behind
standard Refs, and should be followed by work to remove ReferenceUnion
completely.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=122424416
This refactors the existing premium list functionality into the new
class StaticPremiumListPricingEngine, which implements PricingEngine.
A backfill @OnLoad is provided to default existing Registry entities
into the static implementation. For now there is just this one
implementation. Dagger map multibinding is used to generate the total
set of allowed pricing engines, and allows other parties to plug in
their own implementations.
The pricing engine is a required field on the Registry object. If you
don't want a particular Registry to actually have a premium list, then
use the static pricing engine but don't actually set a premium list.
A subsequent CL will refactor the Key<PremiumList> field on the
Registry entity class to be handled solely by the
StaticPremiumListPricingEngine implementation. Going forward, all
configuration and implementation details that are specific to a given
pricing engine should be handled by that pricing engine, and not as
fields on the Registry object.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=121850176
