Both WhoisAction and WhoisHttpAction set the HTTP response content type to "text/plain". There is no need to defensively escape the content. In fact, by escaping the content, it creates more problems down the line.
When used in a website, the response should be written into a DOM node by setting the textContent of the node, which automatically escapes the content.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=196743398
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
PDT testing revealed a couple ways in which our WHOIS output was non-compliant. First, the Consistent Labeling & Display policy dictates that the contact IDs must be ROIDs. See rule 11 in https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/rdds-labeling-policy-2017-02-01-en. Second, PDT tests expect that a WHOIS response will treat missing values either by omitting the line entirely, or by including the line with a blank value, but not both. So this is legal:
Phone Number: 123-4567
Phone Number Ext:
Fax Number: 123-4568
Fax Number Ext:
and this is legal:
Phone Number: 123-4567
Fax Number: 123-4568
but this is not:
Phone Number: 123-4567
Phone Number Ext:
Fax Number: 123-4568
In the last example, one extension line is present with a blank value, while the other extension line is omitted. We cannot do both. Therefore, we should update our code to omit lines with no value. Since we can't guarantee that we will always emit all lines that the parse might expect to see, it is safe to use the policy of omitting lines with no value.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=158184150
WHOIS disclaimer is read from the config yaml file directly and the line breaks
within the text does not contain carriage return, which ICANN requires. This
CL fixes the non-compliance.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=156359526
The absence of these fields causes RDE failures, so they are in effect
required on any functioning registry system. We are currently
experiencing problems in sandbox caused by null values on these fields.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=155474895
This fixes#23 for @parsoj by allowing a custom disclaimer to be
specified via dependency injection modules.
By making the disclaimer part of the dependency injection graph, it can
come from anywhere.
For example, if I was Donuts, I would have my own repository. I'd use an
external http_archive() repository for Domain Registry. Then I would
write my own Dagger @Component for each App Engine module. My Component
would have a list of Dagger Modules, which I copied from the Domain
Registry version. Then I would swap out ConfigModule with my own
DonutsConfigModule, which provides the same values.
So long as a method exists that @Provides @Config("whoisRegistry"), and
the module containing it is listed in the @Component, the dependency
injection graph becomes valid and complete for the whois package
(provided other dependencies are met.)
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=128082921
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/whois/WhoisResponseImpl.java (Browse further)
