This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
In the great flow flattening, ResourceFlowUtils grew a couple nice helpers
for rebuilding transferrable resources (Domains and Contacts) upon the
resolution of a transfer - approvePendingTransfer() and denyPendingTransfer().
Most transfer-resolving callsites use one of these two helpers, but for legacy
reasons the deletion flows (DomainDeleteFlow and DeleteContactsAndHostsAction)
were instead using the "manual" resolvePendingTransfer() method or its even more
low-level createResolvedTransferData() helper instead of denyPendingTransfer().
It's simpler to just have two options - approve and deny - so this CL inlines
createResolvedTransferData() into resolvePendingTransfer() and makes the latter
a private helper for the approve/denyPendingTransfer() public helpers.
This CL also adds sanity checks that approve/denyPendingTransfer() are called
only with the logically appropriate values of TransferStatus.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=170819358
Allow superusers to change the grace period and allow
superusers to change the pending delete length.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=168028545
The probers make a constant stream of create and delete calls, which we don't
want to account for when constructing transaction reports. This change will
cause only real TLDs to log create and delete transaction records.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=166737801
This is the last of many cls adding explicit logging in all our domain
mutation flows to facilitate transaction reporting.
The transfer process is as follows:
GAINING sends a TransferRequest to LOSING
LOSING either acks (TransferApprove), nacks (TransferReject) or does nothing
(auto approve). For acks and autoapproves, we produce a +1 counter for GAINING
and LOSING for domain-gaining/losing-successful for each registrar, to be
reported on the approve date + the transfer grace period. For nacks, we produce
a +1 counter for domain-gaining/losing-nacked for each registrar.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=166535579
This is the third of many cls adding explicit logging in all our domain
mutation flows to facilitate transaction reporting.
We add a +1 counter for either grace or nograce deletes, based on the grace period status of the domain. We then search back in time for DOMAIN_CREATE, DOMAIN_RENEW and DOMAIN_AUTORENEW HistoryEntries off the same resource that happened in their corresponding grace periods (5, 5 and 45 days respectively). All transaction records for these events are then given -1 counters to properly account for cancellations in the NET_CREATE and NET_RENEW fields.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=166506010
The --superuser command in the nomulus command-line tool should be
bypassing checks on whether the passed-in registrar client ID has access
to the TLD in question, but currently it is not.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=158974462
As part of b/36599833, this makes FlowRunner log the appropriate ICANN activity
report field name for each flow it runs as part of a structured JSON log
statement which can be parsed to generate ICANN activity reports (under the key
"icannActivityReportField").
In order to support this, we introduce an annotation for Flow classes called
@ReportingSpec and a corresponding enum of values for this annotation, which is
IcannReportingTypes.ActivityReportField, that stores the mapping of constant
enum values to field names.
The mapping from flows to fields is fairly obvious, with three exceptions:
- Application flows are all accounted under domains, since applications are
technically just deferred domain creates within the EPP protocol
- ClaimsCheckFlow is counted as a domain check
- DomainAllocateFlow is counted as a domain create
In addition, I've added tests to all the corresponding flows that we are
indeed logging what we expect.
We'll also need to log the TLD for this to be useful, but I'm doing that in a
follow-up CL.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=151283411
This documents some slightly spooky behavior around domains that have an expiration time within their pendingDelete window (meaning the whole period from DomainDeleteFlow running to the actual deletionTime, not just the 5-day pendingDelete grace period). They will experience an autorenew in terms of expiration time and grace period status due to cloneProjectedAtTime(), but without the usual artifacts of an autorenew (billing event and poll message).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149019980
This also adds a domain update pricing hook to DomainPricingCustomLogic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142286755
A previous CL inadvertently caused the system to always set the transfer status to SERVER_CANCELLED when deleting a resource, even if there was no transfer. This led to RDE problems.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140890919
Currently we pass in null. However, from the spec:
<domain:acDate> element that contains the date and time of a
required or completed response. For a PENDING request, the value
identifies the date and time by which a response is required
before an automated response action will be taken by the server.
For all other status types, the value identifies the date and time
when the request was completed."
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5731#page-16, section 3.1.3
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139363370
The callsites were inconsistent between whether they were passing empty list or
null, and many of the ones that were passing null were not correctly annotated
with @Nullable. I'm now going with empty list throughout except for the final
step where the actual field that will be transformed into XML is set, where it
is coerced to null to avoid an empty element in the XML output.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139340837
HostResource and DomainApplication are not transferable, (or at
least, not directly in the case of hosts) and have no need for
the TransferData field. In a flat-flow world, we can push it down
to where it's actually used.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139201423
1) Don't do ofy().load() inside a model class (in DomainAuthInfo)
2) Move the one use of verify into the one caller in ResourceFlowUtils
3) Hosts don't support authInfo, so remove useless code
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137984809
This concludes your flow flattening experience. Please
fill out a flow flattening satisfaction survey before
exiting.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137903095
Now that the flows are flattened, the commitAdditionalLogicChanges() call, which used to come later in the flow to actually save the Datastore objects, is now happening right after the performAdditionalXXXLogic() call. So we can instead just do the saves in performAdditionalXXXLogic(), and get rid of the separate call. As a first step, this CL simply makes commitAdditionalLogicChanges() a private method that gets called internally by the extra logic manager. Later, we can move the saves into their proper position, affecting only the extra logic class itself.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137529991
Very few flows actually check the phase. Push the checks down to the leaf
flows so that we can remove the inherited code from ResourceFlow and replace
it with utility methods. In the process, document and test two places that
throw the exception but did not previously test it.
This introduces a temporary hack in BaseDomainCreateFlow that does something
specific for DomainApplicationCreateFlow. It will go away literally tomorrow
when I flatten that flow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135480538
These were historically separate due to the old flow
structure, but now they should be one exception.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133984858
While working on an implementation of TLD-specific logic, it was realized that the extra logic methods would need access to the flow's HistoryEntry, so that things like poll messages could be parented properly.
Also, the update flow had not been fixed to perform the fee check.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132561527
This CL enhances various domain flows (check, create, delete, renew, restore, transfer, update) so that they invoke the appropriate methods on the object implementing the TLD's RegistryExtraFlowLogic (if any). TldSpecificLogicProxy is also updated to invoke RegistryExtraFlowLogic proxy (if any) to fetch the appropriate price. The tests use a made-up extra flow logic object which can be attached to a test TLD to make sure that the proper routines are being invoked.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132486734
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
We want to support multiple versions of the fee extension, to allow new features while maintaining backward compatibility. This CL extends the framework and adds one new version, 0.11 (spec version 7), to the existing version 0.6 (spec version 3). A follow-on CL will add version 0.12 (spec version 8).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=127849044
Daggerizes all of the EPP flows. This does not change anything yet
about the flows themselves, just how they are invoked, but after
this CL it's safe to @Inject things into flow classes.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=125382478
This is so we can associate history records with all mutations when doing
database maintenance.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=123209304
This refactors the existing premium list functionality into the new
class StaticPremiumListPricingEngine, which implements PricingEngine.
A backfill @OnLoad is provided to default existing Registry entities
into the static implementation. For now there is just this one
implementation. Dagger map multibinding is used to generate the total
set of allowed pricing engines, and allows other parties to plug in
their own implementations.
The pricing engine is a required field on the Registry object. If you
don't want a particular Registry to actually have a premium list, then
use the static pricing engine but don't actually set a premium list.
A subsequent CL will refactor the Key<PremiumList> field on the
Registry entity class to be handled solely by the
StaticPremiumListPricingEngine implementation. Going forward, all
configuration and implementation details that are specific to a given
pricing engine should be handled by that pricing engine, and not as
fields on the Registry object.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=121850176
Utilizing this function in the recurring billing event [], in order to abstract a lot of the expansion logic out of the MR itself.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=121579246
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/flows/domain/DomainDeleteFlow.java (Browse further)
