It can always be brought back if we find an actual use case for it, but for now, it shouldn't be in the standard distribution given that it has no users.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143044153
Also adds a mechanism to ensure that fee extensions are included when custom
pricing logic adds a custom fee, and fixes up the domain restore flow to
properly use the restore price.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142715136
This also adds a domain update pricing hook to DomainPricingCustomLogic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142286755
Per a passing conversation with Corey, want to make sure that anchor tenants can still register during an active LRP period. No changes to the flows, just some explicit testing.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142181395
A previous CL inadvertently caused the system to always set the transfer status to SERVER_CANCELLED when deleting a resource, even if there was no transfer. This led to RDE problems.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140890919
This addresses an issue where the existing logic assumed that the presence of a
signed mark means the current flow is a sunrise/sunrush request, when this isn't
necessarily true. It's safe to ignore signed marks in other circumstances.
This is a combination of work by Justin Graham <justin.af.graham@gmail.com>,
Nick Felt, and me (Ben). It is based on the original PR located at:
https://github.com/google/nomulus/pull/41
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140784461
Swap all calls to TldSpecificLogicProxy.getCreatePrice() to the counterpart in
DomainPricingLogic. Also makes necessary changes for testing to work, including
fake implementations of DomainPricingCustomLogic and
DomainCreateLofwCustomLogic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140754334
Currently we pass in null. However, from the spec:
<domain:acDate> element that contains the date and time of a
required or completed response. For a PENDING request, the value
identifies the date and time by which a response is required
before an automated response action will be taken by the server.
For all other status types, the value identifies the date and time
when the request was completed."
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5731#page-16, section 3.1.3
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139363370
and HostResource.
DomainApplication is not transferable and has no need for this
field. HostResource needs it because it can be transferred with
a domain.
This is all in service of removing the ofy().load() inside of
host's cloneProjectedAtTime.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139346925
HostResource and DomainApplication are not transferable, (or at
least, not directly in the case of hosts) and have no need for
the TransferData field. In a flat-flow world, we can push it down
to where it's actually used.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139201423
Right now, DomainApplicationCreateFlow checks to make sure that the registration period is in years, but doesn't store it in the DomainApplication explicitly. Instead, when DomainAllocateFlow runs later, it goes back to the XML in the HistoryEntry to get the number of years. Corey suggests that it would be cleaner to store the number of years in the DomainApplication. This is stage one of a data migration; we store the value, but don't actually read it anywhere except in tests. If we have any outstanding domain applications, we will then need to write a scrap tool to populate the years field, after which we can start relying on the field.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137317739
We already had methods to return just the create or just the renew price. I added more to return just the premium flag or just the fee class.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136833071
The renew flow was still using PricingEngineProxy directly, meaning that it did not pick up on any TLD-specific pricing logic. Fixed this, and added tests to make sure.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136757922
There are no applications extant that predate the creationTrid field.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136047561
This is to better distinguish between an LRP "token" (the string passed along in EPP) and the datastore entity that contains the token and all metadata.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135943480
aka regexing for fun and profit.
This also makes sure that there are no statements after the
throwing statement, since these would be dead code. There
were a surprising number of places with assertions after
the throw, and none of these are actually triggered in tests
ever. When I found these, I replaced them with try/catch/rethrow
which makes the assertions actually happen:
before:
// This is the ExceptionRule that checks EppException marshaling
thrown.expect(FooException.class);
doThrowingThing();
assertSomething(); // Dead code!
after:
try {
doThrowingThing();
assertWithMessage("...").fail();
} catch (FooException e) {
assertSomething();
// For EppExceptions:
assertAboutEppExceptins().that(e).marshalsToXml();
}
To make this work, I added EppExceptionSubject.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135793407
Very few flows actually check the phase. Push the checks down to the leaf
flows so that we can remove the inherited code from ResourceFlow and replace
it with utility methods. In the process, document and test two places that
throw the exception but did not previously test it.
This introduces a temporary hack in BaseDomainCreateFlow that does something
specific for DomainApplicationCreateFlow. It will go away literally tomorrow
when I flatten that flow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135480538
This is how it should be in every test, but we used to not be
so careful about this. I had to touch this file anyways, so
I fixed it here.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135387267
Almost all uses were in test classes, which I replaced with clock.nowUTC().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134993149
TestExtraLogicManager is pretty kludgy, and should be replaced with injection, mocking, etc. But in the meantime, using a dedicated error to signal its success, rather than IllegalArgumentException as was done before, at least makes things a little easier to follow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134832315
This CL fixes a bug introduced in [] which caused an exception to be thrown when an attempt was made to update a domain without a fee extension, even if the update was free, as it usually is. The fee extension should only be required if the update is not free.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134830250
They were taking a DateTime "now", which would seem like it would be the time of
when the resource was deleted, but it was actually the time by which the
resource was deleted, with the actual deletion time being hardcoded to a day
prior. The confusion was evident because a fair number of tests were passing
the wrong thing. I renamed the parameter "deletionTime" to make it exactly
clear what it's doing and fixed up some callsites where necessary.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134818032
This was added in [] but is not actually necessary - the exDate
in the EppOutput is already checked by the response XML comparison step.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134296246
The reason field is 1:1 mapped to skus in billing reports. Need to add a new reason for EAP for this type of billing event for reporting to work correctly. Also map that reason to the correct SKU.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134005364
