The APNIC conformance checker points out that, according to RFC 7483,
RDAP remarks should be included only as part of object classes such as
domains, nameservers and entities, not in help responses and so on.
Note that something is amiss here -- If RFC 7483 is read strictly, the
remarks boilerplate for domain, nameserver and entity search results
should appear not at the top level, as we currently do, but as part of
each constituent object. However, the conformance checker does not
seem to complain about that. So I have added this to the RDAP questions
list, and am leaving the boilerplate at the top level for now.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=117557594
java.net.IDN uses outdated IDNA2003. We've created a replacement
class that uses the modern UTS46 transitional standard via the
IDNA library. This fixes uses of IDN in the RDAP code.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=117243868
The ICANN RDAP Profile (dated 3 December 2015) requires certain boilerplate entries at the top level of the JSON object. Specifically:
1.4.4. The terms of service of the RDAP service MUST be specified in the
notices object in the topmost JSON object of the response. The notices
object MUST contain a links object [RFC7483]. The links object MUST
contain an URL of the contracted party providing the RDAP service.
1.4.10. An RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with a description
containing the string “This response conforms to the RDAP Operational
Profile for gTLD Registries and Registrars version 1.0”.
1.5.18. A domain name RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with
a title “EPP Status Codes”, a description containing the string “For
more information on domain status codes, please visit
https://icann.org/epp” and a links member with the
https://icann.org/epp URL.
1.5.20. A domain name RDAP response MUST contain a remarks member with
a title “Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form”, a description containing
the string “URL of the ICANN Whois Inaccuracy Complaint Form:
https://www.icann.org/wicf” and a links member with the
https://www.icann.org/wicf URL.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=116389950
This is the penultimate step of migrating away from sharedFields. The next step is to remove them entirely.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=116364048
