Most common:
- Unnecessary parentheses and operator precedence clarify (self-explanatory)
- Reference equality--there were a few instances of using == or != improperly
- Qualification of Builder (and similar) imports so that it's clear which type of Builder we're referring to
- Marking some immutable classes with @Immutable since EP desires that all enums be deeply immutable
- String.split() having "surprising behavior"
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=230971531
This eliminates the use of Objectify polymorphism for EPP resources entirely
(yay!), which makes the Registry 3.0 database migration easier.
It is unfortunate that the naming parallelism of EppResources is lost between
ContactResource, HostResource, and DomainResource, but the actual type as far as
Datastore was concerned was DomainBase all along, and it would be a much more
substantial data migration to allow us to continue using the class name
DomainResource now that we're no longer using Objectify polymorphism. This
simply isn't worth it.
This also removes the polymorphic Datastore indexes (which will no longer
function as of this change). The non-polymorphic replacement indexes were added
in []
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=230930546
This also deletes the associated commands and domain application specific
entities.
We haven't used any of these TLD phases since early 2015 and have no
intent to do so in the future, so it makes sense to delete them now so we
don't have to carry them through the Registry 3.0 migration.
Note that, while there are data model changes, there should be no required
data migrations. The fields and entities being removed will simply remain
as orphans. I confirmed that the removed types (such as the SUNRUSH_ADD
GracePeriodType) are no longer used in production data, and left types
that are still used, e.g. BillingEvent.Flag.LANDRUSH or
HistoryEntry.Type.ALLOCATE.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=228752843
I ran into this while writing some other code and having the exception message
would have made it easier to debug.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=199292321
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/model/domain/GracePeriod.java (Browse further)
