Made it clear that it is a util class and moved some of the functions only used in NordnUploadAction (to NordnUploadAction). Also used Retrier to handle retries when leasing tasks.
These changes allow us to no longer use InjectRule in related unit tests.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=217761117
This is an additional signal we can use for the billing/invoicing pipeline that
will be helfpul in targeting invoice rows that may need adjustment.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=217524250
Note that the check flow does not yet handle any kind of allocation token
handling at all. Step 2 will be to add allocation token handling there, so a
RESERVED_FOR_ANCHOR_TENANT or RESERVED_FOR_SPECIFIC_USE domain will show as
available instead of reserved if the right token is specified using the
extension. Then once that's done, we can use that information to adjust the
price accordingly as well.
Right now the behavior with a domain check is that reserved domains always show
as reserved, even if they're anchor tenants.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=215599350
It doesn't do anything that ALLOWED_IN_SUNRISE doesn't do, and there's no point
in having two separate types when we can simply keep track of the semantic
difference between the two by using different lists (as we have for .soy).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=212997752
Unlike anchor tenants, these domains can be registered for any number of years,
but only during GA, as third parties cannot register domains pre-GA except
through the anchor tenant program.
Since this is new functionality, unlike creation of anchor tenants, there is no
fallback provided to send codes through the domain authcode; they must be sent
using the allocation token extension.
And note that, like with anchor tenants, providing the domain-specific
allocation token overrides any other reserved types that might apply to that
domain.
No changes are necessary to the domain application create flow because of the
above restriction to GA.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=212310701
We never used it and don't have any plans to use it going forward. All
conceivable parts of its functionality that we might use going forward have
already been subsumed into allocation tokens, which are a simpler way of
handling the same use case that are also standards-compliant.
Also gets rid of the hideous ANCHOR_ prefix on anchor tenant EPP authcodes
that was only ever necessary because of overloading the authcode for
anchor tenant creation. Going forward it'll be based on allocation tokens,
so there's no risk of conflicts.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=209418194
Note that this gets rid of anchor tenant codes in reserved lists (yay!), which
are no longer valid. They have to come from allocation tokens now.
This removes support for LRP from domain application create flow (that's fine,
we never used it and I'm going to delete all of LRP later). It also uses
allocation tokens from EPP authcodes as a fallback, for now, but that will be
removed later once we switch fully to the allocation token mechanism.
This doesn't yet allow registration of RESERVED_FOR_SPECIFIC_USE domains using
the allocation token extension; that will come in the next CL. Ditto for
showing these reserved domains as available on domain checks when the allocation
token is specified.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=209019617
Domains that are reserved with type NAME_COLLISION can be registered defensively
during sunrise only, but DNS can never resolve for them. Correspondingly, we
need to apply the SERVER_HOLD status for such registrations. We also send the
registrar a poll message informing them of this act.
This brings us up to feature parity with end-date sunrise (implemented in
DomainAllocateFlow), which already has all of this handling.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=205277728
Async tasks will now re-enqueue themselves after completion if there are
additional pending future actions. This allows all parts of domain delete flows
to be successfully re-saved as the parts happen, without going past the maximum
allowed 30 day task ETA limit. The first task runs at 30 days out when the
redemption grace period ends, and that task then enqueues another task to run 5
more days in the future, when the deletion is final and the pending delete
status gets removed.
No data migration plan is necessary because future resaves defaults to empty,
and indeed will always be empty on transfers. So previously enqueued tasks will
still be valid.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=202949677
We'll continue to use injected clocks for the rest of our tests that use signed marks files, so that they don't all fail after the current validity period. The new test TmchTestDataExpirationTest will let us know when the files are expired, so we can update them.
All updated test data files come from https://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse/registries-registrars
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=202208196
This is used in the domain transfer and delete flows, both of which are
asynchronous flows that have implicit default actions that will be taken at some
point in the future. This CL adds scheduled re-saves to take place soon after
those default actions would become effective, so that they can be re-saved
quickly if so.
Unfortunately the redemption grace period on our TLDs is 35 days, which exceeds
the 30 day maximum task ETA in App Engine, so these won't actually fire. That's
fine though; the deletion is actually effective as of 5 days, and this is just
removing the grace period.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=201345274
This will allow us to check in actual SUNRISE billing policies per launch (15% discount), instead of relying on ad-hoc timestamps.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=200077926
Also prevents signed marks from being used in non-sunrise TldStates.
Currently, we send out a Lordn update only when there's a ClaimNotice, or if
we're in end-date sunrise.
But EPPs can contain a SignedMark instead of a ClaimsNotice for trademarked
domains - in which case we aren't sending out Lordn update. This also applies
to start-date sunrises.
We also change the SignedMark behavior for superusers. Currently, if a
mismatched signed mark is given as superuser, we accept it. That causes
problems when we want to send the Lordn update.
Instead - we no longer allow superusers to give a mismatched SignedMark (just
as we don't allow users to give a bad ClaimNotice). A super user can still
create a domain WITHOUT a signed mark - but if one is provided, it must match.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=199783411
New metrics are necessary because the new API no longer wraps
an EPP flow, therefore does not get metrics for free.
Metrics include
- An EventMetric for processing time
- An IncrementableMetric for request count, with
availability (available/reserved/registered) and
pricing (standard/premium) fields
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=199708592
This is consistent with how we treat RESTORE billing events as well- in
general, fees are considered to be amortized over the course of a year (by the
invoicing team).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=199684843
Copied class and test from CheckApiAction. All unit tests passing.
Remaining work: add metrics
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=198916177
Also added a couple of more tests to make sure that we cover all edge cases.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=195872013
Currently we determine fee type from the fee extension description by checking if the format string of the FeeType contains the description we received. The formatting string for EAP is "Early Access Period, fee expires: %s", so the fee description generated by a domain check command, like "Early Access Period, fee expires: 2022-03-01T00:00:00.000Z", is not recognized as EAP.
This CL adds the ability to add arbitrary extra description strings to the FeeType for a description to match against. It also changes the match to "the given description contains any of the strings from the list of format string plus extra description strings".
For EAP, we added an extra description string "Early Access Period", so any fee description that contains "Early Access Period" will be matched to EAP FeeType, including the specific description (that contains the expiry time) that we send in a domain check.
Also improved error message on multiple fee type matching.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=194149162
This verifies anchor tenant creates by registrars are for exactly 2 years, to simplify billing down the line (anchor tenants get 2 years of free domain creates).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=193931858
This allows a registrar to check domain availability even if the fee extension is not set. To obtain the premium price or create the domain, the fee extension is still needed.
PS: I believe the previous tests are erroneous anyway. It is the presence of fee extensions in the check request that we were looking for. Checking if the extension is declared during login has no bearing on the results.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=192778137
A "mark" tells us that the holder owns the trademark for a given domain name. It is signed for authentication.
If the signature's certificate is either "not yet valid" or "expired", we return explicit errors to that effect.
But in addition to the signature's certificate, the mark itself might not be valid yet or already expired. Right now if that happens - we return an error saying "the mark doesn't match the domain name".
That is wrong - as the mark can match the domain name, just be expired. Returning "the mark doesn't match the domain name" in that case is misleading.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=190069976
This simplifies calculating the overall invoice by giving RESTORE fees a
period equal to the period of the associated RENEW (1 year). Older
BillingEvents will not be backfilled, and will have periodYears = null.
Invoicing and business both agree this is a valid representation, since RESTORE fees are intrinsically tied to the 1-year RENEW it's associated with.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=188041777
It was nullable all along, but wasn't tagged as such, and thus it was
possible to misuse the method from its call sites.
Also adds an assertion about no NORDN tasks being enqueued in a failing
domain create test for a required signed mark.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=187649865
Also changed the name of "verifyRegistryStateAllowsLaunchFlows" to "verifyRegistryStateAllowsApplicationFlows", because there are now launch flows that don't use applications (start-date sunrise).
Finally, added a test to showcase the "super-user" power that EPPs with Anchor Tenants have. There's no change in behavior in that regard in this CL - we just add a test to make it explicit.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=187517199
After investigating common domain create/update command usage
patterns by registrars, we noticed that it is frequent for a
given registrar to reuse both hosts (using a standardized set of
nameservers) as well as contacts (e.g. for privacy/proxy
services). With these usage patterns, potential per-registrar
throughput during high volume scenarios (i.e. first moments of
General Availability) suffers from hitting hot keys in Datastore.
The solution, implemented in this CL, is to add short-term
in-memory caching for contacts and hosts, analogous to how we are
already caching Registry and Registrar entities. These new
cached paths are only used inside domain flows to determine
existence and deleted/pending delete status of contacts and
hosts. This is a potential loss of transactional consistency, but
in practice it's hard to imagine this having negative effects, as
contacts or hosts that are in use cannot be deleted, and caching
would primarily affect widely used contacts and hosts.
Note that this caching can be turned on or off through a
configuration option, and by default would be off. We'd only want
it on when we really needed it, i.e. during a big launch.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=187093378
I'm actually surprised that we had this in our code, as it seems like a huge
oversight, but we were individually loading each and every referenced contact
and host during domain/application create/update/allocate flows. Loading them
all as a single batch should reduce round trips to Datastore by a good deal,
thus improving performance.
We aren't giving up any transactional consistency in doing so and the only
potential downside I can think of is that we're always loading all contacts/
hosts instead of only some of them, in the rare case that one of the earlier
contacts/hosts is actually in pending delete (which allowed short-circuiting).
However, the gains from only making one round-trip should swamp the potential
losses in occasionally loading more data than is strictly necessary.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=186656118
Currently we validate the fee extension by summing up all fees present in the extension and comparing it against the total fee to be charged. While this works in most cases, we'd like the ability to individually validate each fee. This is especially useful during EAP when two fees are charged, a regular "create" fee that would also be amount we charge during renewal, and a one time "EAP" fee.
Because we can only distinguish fees by their descriptions, we try to match the description to the format string of the fee type enums. We also only require individual fee matches when we are charging more than one type of fees, which makes the change compatible with most existing use cases where only one fees is charged and the description field is ignored in the extension.
We expect the workflow to be that a registrar sends a domain check, and we reply with exactly what fees we are expecting, and then it will use the descriptions in the response to send us a domain create with the correct fees.
Note that we aggregate fees within the same FeeType together. Normally there will only be one fee per type, but in case of custom logic there could be more than one fee for the same type. There is no way to distinguish them as they both use the same description. So it is simpler to just aggregate them.
This CL also includes some reformatting that conforms to google-java-format output.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=186530316
The START_DATE_SUNRISE phase allows registration of domains only with a signed mark. In all other respects - it is identical to the GENERAL_AVAILABILITY phase.
Note that Anchor Tenants bypass all checks, and are hence able to register domains without a signed mark.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=185534793
When enabled for a registrar, all EPP operations on premium domains that have
costs (e.g. creates, renews, transfers) will fail unless the EPP fee extension
is used to explicitly ack the amount of fee as part of the EPP transaction.
This ack is required regardless of whether premium fee acking is required at
the registry level. No data migration is necessary since false is the desired
default for this new attribute.
This CL also contains some slight refactoring of static utility methods used to
perform fee verification; there was short-circuiting at call-sites in two
places when what was really needed was two methods, one implementing additional
functionality on top of the other, and calling the inner method in the places
where short-circuiting had previously been necessary.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=184229363
This uses an extensibility mechanism similar to that of WhoisCommandFactory
and CustomLogicFactory, namely, that a fully qualified Java class is
specified in the YAML file for each environment with the allocation token
custom logic to be used. By default, this points to a no-op base class
that does nothing. Users that wish to add their own allocation token
custom logic can simply create a new class that extends
AllocationTokenCustomLogic and then configure it in their .yaml config
files.
This also renames the existing *FlowCustomLogic *Flow instance variables
from customLogic to flowCustomLogic, to avoid the potential confusion with
the new AllocationTokenCustomLogic class that also now exists.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=183003112
Next up is adding custom logic so that the results of these checks can be
more meaningful.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=181660956
The next step is to add them for domain checks as well (which is simpler
because it doesn't involve validation).
This requires the addition of a TrimWhitespaceAdapter for XML JAXB objects,
which will prove useful for other @XmlValue attributes in the future.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=181526726
The extension itself isn't used for anything yet; allocation tokens can be
passed for domain creates and checks but are ignored if present. This will
be changed in a subsequent CL that adds AllocationToken entities and related
logic. Usage of this extension in any other EPP flow will throw an
UnsupportedExtensionException.
The relevant spec is https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gould-allocation-token-04
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=181343188
Stream.concat only accepts 2 parameters. Streams.concat on the other hand
accepts any number of parameters.
Moving to Streams.concat for all uses (2 or more) makes sense for uniformity
and convenience reasons.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=179716648
Failing to use the fee extension during EAP can result in charges to registrars
that are radically different than what they may have been expecting.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=177597883
This removes some qualifiers that aren't necessary (e.g. public/abstract on interfaces, private on enum constructors, final on private methods, static on nested interfaces/enums), uses Java 8 lambdas and features where that's an improvement
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=177182945
This command is used by registry operators to apply registry locks to
domain names.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=176549874
This way it is consistent with the rest of our domain-related flows, which
consistently use the Domain* prefix. Note that claims checks are just a
special case of domain checks anyway, which run under DomainCheckFlow. This
will make dashboards looking at domain commands "just work" with a regexp of
Domain.*, without having to special-case in ClaimsCheck.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=172608964
The nameserver may be external, in which case its TLD will not appear in our
list of valid TLDs, and the search will be rejected erroneously.
Tests for letter case canonicalizations also added at reviewer's suggestion.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171985702
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
This CL adds transferredRegistrationExpirationTime as a TransferData field
persisted to Datastore. It's only relevant for domains, and it represents the
registration expiration time resulting from the approval of the most recent
transfer request. For pending transfers, we assume the transfer will be
server-approved, and thus in DomainTransferRequestFlow we set this field to the
existing computed value serverApproveNewExpirationTime, which is what we use
for setting up the server-approve autorenew billing event and poll message.
In DomainTransferApproveFlow we overwrite this field with the freshly computed
newExpirationTime, whereas in DomainTransferCancel/RejectFlow (and in the
implicit cancel of DomainDeleteFlow during a pending transfer) we null it out.
There are two key benefits to having this field, which are described in more
detail in b/36405140.
1) b/25084229 - it allows storage of a frozen value to back the "exDate" field
of DomainTransferResponse, which we can use to fix various errors with how
exDate display currently works.
2) b/36354434 - it allows DomainResource.cloneProjectedAtTime() to just directly
set the registrationExpirationTime to this value, without computing it de
novo, which reduces duplicated logic and ensures that the new expiration time
matches the autorenew child objects.
This CL only starts writing the field on TransferData as persisted directly on
the DomainResource itself. We'll then want to backfill the field for at
least pending transfers, whether expired or not (so we can do (2) above), but
I think we might as well backfill it for all pending and approved transfers
so that we also fix (1) even for historical transfers. And then we can start
actually reading the field for both purposes. (Note that for (1), this will
only fix synchronous transfer responses served via DomainTransferQueryFlow,
not async transfer responses served via poll messages, since these have already
been persisted with a potentially bad exDate, but I don't think it's worth a
backfill for those).
One last naming note: I chose the verbose transferredRegistrationExpirationTime
rather than the extendedRegistrationExpirationTime of DomainTransferResponse
because (as is the case in autorenew grace, or for a superuser transfer) the
new registration time isn't necessarily extended at all; it may be the same as
the pre-transfer expiration time. Also, including "registration" helps clarify
w.r.t. pendingTransferExpirationTime which refers confusingly to the expiry of
the transfer itself, rather than the domain registration.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171858083
In the great flow flattening, ResourceFlowUtils grew a couple nice helpers
for rebuilding transferrable resources (Domains and Contacts) upon the
resolution of a transfer - approvePendingTransfer() and denyPendingTransfer().
Most transfer-resolving callsites use one of these two helpers, but for legacy
reasons the deletion flows (DomainDeleteFlow and DeleteContactsAndHostsAction)
were instead using the "manual" resolvePendingTransfer() method or its even more
low-level createResolvedTransferData() helper instead of denyPendingTransfer().
It's simpler to just have two options - approve and deny - so this CL inlines
createResolvedTransferData() into resolvePendingTransfer() and makes the latter
a private helper for the approve/denyPendingTransfer() public helpers.
This CL also adds sanity checks that approve/denyPendingTransfer() are called
only with the logically appropriate values of TransferStatus.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=170819358
