We want to be able to view / test / debug how the registrar console looks for our clients.
However, we don't want to accidentally change the data for registrars, especially in a "non-accountable" way (where we later don't know who did that change)
So we do 2 things here:
- Add a "mode" (read-only and read-write) to the getRegistrarForUser function. We set it according to what we want to do with the registrar. Currently, read-write is only requested for the "update" RegistrarSetting action. Admins will have read-only access to all registrars, but read-write access only to the "admin registrar" (or whatever registrar they are contacts for).
- Support an undocumented "clientId=XXX" query param that replaces the "guessClientIdForUser" function in the original page load. We can then set it when we want to view a different account.
We also change the navigation links on the HTML page to preserve the query.
-------------------------
This might be used also for a better user experience for our clients, especially those with multiple "clientId"s (some registrar entities have multiple "registrar" objects)
Currently, they have to have a separate user for each clientId, and only have one user allowed which has both read and write permissions.
Using this change, we can give them the possibility to add users on their own, some with read-only access (to view billing information without being able to change anything), and use a single user for all their clientIds.
-------------------------
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=215480610
This is an intermediate CL, part of the Registrar Console cleanup.
TL;DR:
- the current state: resource.js points to a resource TYPE on the server (only registrars can be resources right now), but the specific resource is selected based on the user (we select the "first resource of this type that the user has access to)
- new state: resource.js points to a SPECIFIC resource (TYPE + ID).
In this CL the server still chooses the resource like before (first one that user has access to) but we make sure the returned resource is the same one we requested.
In a subsequent CL we will use the requested ID to load the resource, and then make sure the user has access to that resource.
---------------------------
When loading the RegistrarConsole HTML page, the server determines which clientId belongs to the user ("guesses" it by looking for the first registrar that has this user as contact). It sends the relevant clientId back with the page load.
However, this information isn't currently used in the JS requests to read / update the registrar. Instead, currently the client ID is guessed again for each JS access to the server. It is also saved again in the client's "session" cookie.
As a result, it is theoretically possible to have the JS access a different clientID than the original page load (not likely, since it requires a single user registered for multiple registrars AND that the contacts change for the original registrar).
So our goal is to only have a single clientID "value" instead of the 3 we currently have for JS requests (the one from the initial page load, the one saved in the session cookie, the one guessed on the JS request)
As a first step, we send over the "initial page load" clientId on every JS request, and make sure the "session + guessed" value is equal to that one. Later we will remove the "session+guessed" values from the RegistrarSettings, using the "initial page load" clientID instead.
In addition to the "nicer code" implications, having the clientID from the initial page load always used means it'll be easy to have a clientID selection option for users who have access to multiple clientIDs (such as admins)
SECURITY NOTE:the choice of clientID has no security implication since we make sure the user has access to the clientID no matter how we actually choose the clientID on every single server request.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=214459506
We have several "consoles" ("views" in the registrar console). They all affect the same resource - the registrar itself.
Currently, each view creates its own "RESTful resource", even though it's the same resource for all of them, meaning we have copied code and copied "URL endpoint" across multiple files.
I assume this was made so that IF one day we have a "view" to another resource, we can easily add it. But we currently don't have any such view, nor plans to add any.
So according to the YAGNI paradigm, it's better to move the resource creation outside of the console.
Also, IF we do add a view to a different resource - it'll still be more readable to have a map from the "view" to the "resource URL endpoint" alongside the existing map from the "view" to the "console"...
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=213992967
This fixes the Kokoro tests broken by []
Unfortunately this means that the return type changes from a Map to an Object as well,
so all of the .get() lines need to turn into []. Yay weakly typed languages. And
apparently in some error conditions this method could already return the Object type
anyway, even if you passed in a Map, so it's just poorly designed.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=213808477
This properly fixes the issue that was suppressed in [] and
just started breaking today thanks to []
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=213510500
The original thought was that the actions you can do on a resource is:
- create it
- read it
- update it
(I guess you should have "delete" as well, but that isn't currently there)
Although we use "read" and "update", we never use "create". So having it goes against the YAGNI principle :)
Also, it had a bug: when sending a "create", the opt_newId in send_() would
permanentily change the uri of the request, causing any subsequent request to
go to the wrong endpoint.
By removing the "create" we can simplify the rest of the code (the send_() function).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=213029499
We never launched this, don't planning on launching it now anyway, and it's rotted over the past two years anyway.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=202993577
Implement a checkbox in the "Resources" tab to allow registrars to toggle
their "premium price ack required" flag.
Tested:
Verfied the console functionality by hand. I've started work on an
automated test, but we can't actually test those from blaze and the
kokoro tests are way too time-consuming to be practical for development, so
we're going to have to either find a way to run those locally outside of
the normal process or make do without a test.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=190212177
Soy has historically tolerated map accesses on weakly-typed variables. That is, if a template declared a param $p and then did $p['some_key'] in the template body, Soy would treat $p as a map even if it wasn't statically declared as one.
This situation is changing with [] There are now two map types, `map` and `legacy_object_map`. We are trying to migrate every template in [] from `legacy_object_map` to `map`, leaving Soy with one (improved) map type. Because the two map types generate different JS code, Soy can no longer allow map accesses on weakly-typed variables. (If $p['some_key'] occurs in a template and the type of $p is unknown, Soy would not know what code to generate.)
Every parameter whose static type is unknown (`?`) but which is inferred to be a `legacy_object_map` needs to be migrated to a `map`. We are developing tools for this in [] However, as a first step, we need to migrate the subset of these params that use the legacy SoyDoc syntax to use header param syntax with a static type of `?`. (All params declared in SoyDoc are typed as unknown, and it is a compilation error to mix SoyDoc and header param syntax in the same template, so any template that declares a SoyDoc param that is inferred to be a map needs to migrate to header param syntax.)
This CL was prepared by using the tools in [] to create a list of templates declaring SoyDoc params inferred to be legacy_object_maps. This list was then fed to the existing //third_party/java_src/soy/java/com/google/template/soy/tools:ParamMigrator tool. Since this tool migrates whole files instead of individual templates, the resulting CL is a superset of the migration that is actually required. However, since the SoyDoc param syntax has been deprecated for years, and since there is little risk in migrating from one param style to another, I decided to land the superset.
This migration falls under the LSC described at https://docs.google.com/document/d/1dAl-rDMp3oL0Zh_iSTaiHICwtcbLbVIy1FQ0wXSAaHs.
Tested:
TAP --sample for global presubmit queue
[] passed FOSS tests
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=188879980
Rosie CL for []/third_party (local approval/rejection).
[]
b/71392935
Tested:
TAP --sample for global presubmit queue
[]
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=184412611
Thanks to [] shared libraries at Google now produce valid JSON which allows using JSON.parse. It is safer and faster than goog.json.parse which uses eval by default.
NOTE: All shared libraries producing JSON at Google were changed to produce valid JSON. However, if your code uses a custom way of producing JSON (not using the shared libraries) or if your code parses JSON generated a long time ago and stored, this CL might break you so please review with care.
Design doc: []
Tested:
TAP --sample for global presubmit queue
[]
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=166454709
Our build got broken by the deprecation of goog.structs.Map in [] This is a quick fix.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=157236744
Frontend validation: ensures that only one WHOIS abuse contact exist per registrar. Any existing WHOIS abuse contact will be overridden when a new one is designated.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=155289097
RegistrarContacts are allowed to have no "types" specified (they can also have multiple types). However, the registrar console displays the contacts for the logged-in registrar grouped by type into sections, and contacts with no type were simply being omitted from the listing, which was confusing because you can't even log into the console unless your email is listed as a contact, and yet you might then visit the contact settings page and see (apparently) no configured contacts.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=152302159
Significant technical debt has been eliminated. The latest best
practices are also now adopted for dealing with runfiles and dealing
with files across repositories.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140762937
Replace the two drive links on the "contact us" page with values that can be
driven from the config. The drive links are the link to the technical
documentation folder and the link to the registrar's transaction activity
reports. The former is a straightforward static replacement, but the latter
is derived from a per-registrar Google Drive id which must be formatted using
a template from the config module.
Note: This currently requires adding the transaction activity URL template to
the old-style RegistryConfig class instead of the daggerized ConfigModule
because this is the easiest way to pass it though to the non-daggerized
RegistrarServlet. In an upcoming CL, I'll convert RegistrarServlet to
RegistrarAction and then I'll be able to make this template injectable.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137518466
Use bundled params instead of passing individual arguments through
epp_session.js.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136384801
Parameterize integration, support and announcement email addresses and contact
phone number, make static parameters flow through the system in a consistent
manner.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136183813
This is an internal-only feature that breaks the open source build.
CL created with:
dr-replace '(compatible_with.*)' '\1 # MOE:strip_line'
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=128852873
goog.dom.createDom is about to support only the members of
goog.dom.TagName to improve the precision of its return type. This CL
prepares for that.
CL automatically created by:
replace_string --pcre
(\.createDom\(\s*)\'([a-z0-9]+)'
$1goog.dom.TagName.$2
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=128802686
Forward declares symbol. This is an indication to the compiler that the
symbol may be used in the source yet is not required and may not be
provided in compilation.
The most common usage of forward declaration is code that takes a type
as a function parameter but does not need to require it. By forward
declaring instead of requiring, no hard dependency is made, and (if not
required elsewhere) the namespace may never be required and thus, not be
pulled into the JavaScript binary. If it is required elsewhere, it will
be type checked as normal.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=127095620
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
