This serves as proof-of-concept to verify we can use Beam for our invoice generation use case. Namely, it checks that we can:
- Deploy a Beam template to GCS
- Read from Bigquery within the template
- Run the template from App Engine
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=175755390
This is the initial commit of the new billing system, rewritten as an Apache
Beam pipeline. This contains a basic end-to-end pipeline as proof of concept,
and boilerplate for GenerateInvoicesAction, which will eventually be our
automated invoice generation endpoint.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=174184171
It makes sense for all mapreduces to run in backend, especially onces
that are scheduled regularly to run in cron like this one now. We don't
have many instances configured for the tools service anymore on some
of our environments, so backend is the friendliest place for a mapreduce
to run.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=168882122
This adds Bigquery API client code to generate the activity reports from our
now standardSQL queries. The naming mirrors that of RDE (Staging generates the
reports and uploads them to GCS).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=164656344
This is the first step in moving the current []cron-Python reporting scripts
into App Engine, as an official part of the Nomulus package. This copies the
structure of RDE uploads, with a few changes specific to monthly reporting.
I've left some TODOs related to actually testing it on the ICANN endpoint, as we're still not sure how files to be uploaded will be staged, and whether we can actually ping their endpoint on valid ports (80 or 443).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=160408703
Move the "restoreCommitLogs" command from the backend module to the tools
module so it's easier to access with nomulus.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=156768389
It turns out this type parameter was never necessary. A builder only needs the reflexive second type parameter when you want to have a builder inheritance hierarchy where the descendant builders have methods that the ancestor builder doesn't. In that case, the type param enables the ancestor builder's setter methods to automatically return the correct derived type, so that if you start with a derived builder, you can call a setter method inherited from an ancestor and then continue the chain with setters from the derived builder (e.g. new ContactResource.Builder().setCreationTime(now).setContactId(), which otherwise would have returned an EppResource.Builder from setCreationTime(), at which point the call to setContactId() would not compile).
Even then, it's not strictly necessary to use the type parameter, since you could instead just have each derived type override every inherited method to specify itself as the return type. But that would be a lot of extra boilerplate and brittleness.
Anyway, in this case, there is a builder hierarchy, but RequestComponentBuilder specifies all the methods that we're ever going to want on our builders, so there's never any need to be able to call specific derived builder methods. We only even need the individual builder classes so that Dagger can generate them separately for each component.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=148269178
By moving []s into the batch package, which is not included in the frontend service, we pave the way to remove the dependency of frontend on the [] library.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142265351
We should be able to remove the dependency on the App Engine [] library from the frontend service, since no []s actually run there. In order to do this, we need to remove the various []-reliant classes from the frontend service build. This CL begins the process by moving the two async "flows" to a different package which is not included in the frontend service.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142159568
This refactors RequestHandler so that it handles the construction of the request
component itself, rather than being handed a pre-built request component
instance constructed by the invoking servlet.
The motivation for this change is so that RequestHandler can be extended in
future CLs to compute authentication results, and can provide those results as
an available binding in the constructed request component. An alternative
approach could have been to compute the authentication results within
RequestModule itself, but I think it's clearer to keep business logic like
that outside of Dagger providers.
This CL makes the following individual changes:
- Adds request component builders, which implement a RequestComponentBuilder
interface so they can all be manipulated by RequestHandler
- Instead of obtaining request components via factory methods on the global
components, one now can have global-scoped bindings just inject the request
component builders (which requires adding a module to each global component
declaring the subcomponent). This follows the recommended approach here:
http://google.github.io/dagger/subcomponents.html
- Instead of exposing request components on the global component interface,
we now expose module-specific subclasses of RequestHandler that @Inject the
appropriate request component builder's provider and pass it to the superclass
(note that inheritance isn't strictly necessary here but saves boilerplate)
- RequestHandler now takes the Provider<RequestComponentBuilder> and builds
the component itself using its own fresh RequestModule instance. This provides
some nice encapsulation but is mainly needed for adding a RequestAuthModule
in future work.
- RequestHandler also takes UserService now, which can be provided via Dagger
by the subclass. Longer-term that will go away in favor of instead providing
AuthStrategy instances, some of which will use UserService internally.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=138815648
This will replace the existing DnsRefreshForHostRenameAction.
This is stage one of a three stage migration process. It adds the new queue and
[] but doesn't call them yet. Stage two will cut over to using the new
functionality, and stage three will remove the old functionality.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134793963
Now it lives alongside the delete prober data action, as well as any future
batch/maintenance tasks that should run periodically.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134435668
Also creates a new package named 'batch' to house it.
TESTED=I deployed it to alpha, sent a POST request to the task URL, and it
successfully ran the [].
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134332999
This allows handling of N asynchronous deletion requests simultaneously instead
of just 1. An accumulation pull queue is used for deletion requests, and the
async deletion [] is now fired off whenever that pull queue isn't empty,
and processes many tasks at once. This doesn't particularly take more time,
because the bulk of the cost of the async delete operation is simply iterating
over all DomainBases (which has to happen regardless of how many contacts and
hosts are being deleted).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133169336
This is one of several CLs in a sequence for allowing per-TLD DNS
implementations.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=129445641
The old DNS processing was performed by WriteDnsAction, which was invoked by the standard cron fanout action. The new code, which has been running for several months in production, uses ReadDnsQueueAction to do a custom fanout to PublishDnsUpdatesAction. We no longer need the old code, so it's time to remove it.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=127983115
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/module/backend/BackendRequestComponent.java (Browse further)
