This CL changes the domain and contact transfer flows to check the entire
TransferData on the post-transfer resource, rather than just spot-checking
certain fields. This approach provides much better code coverage - in
particular, it checks that the non-request flows (approve, cancel, reject)
don't modify the fields that they shouldn't be modifying, and that they do
actually clear out the transfer server-approve entities fields written by
the transfer request flow. It's slightly orthogonal, but I also added
testing that the server-approve entities fields are actually set in the
request flows, which was previously untested.
This is pre-work for introducing an exDate-storing field into TransferData,
by making it easier to test everywhere that exDate is set *and* unset only
in the correct places.
As part of this CL, I've introduced a TransferData.copyConstantFieldsToBuilder()
method that is like asBuilder() but instead of copying all the fields to the new
builder, it only copies the logically constant ones: losing/gaining client IDs,
the request time and TRID, and transferPeriod. This is useful both in tests but
is also used in the resolvingPendingTransfer() helper that centralizes the core
transfer resolution logic (as of [] That method has its own tests,
and in the process I removed a bunch of crufty defunct TransferData tests.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171053454
Allow superusers to change the transfer period to zero years and allow
superusers to change the automatic transfer length.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=167598314
Now that transfers are always restricted to 1 year, it's unnecessary to store
extendedRegistrationYears on TransferData - it will always be equal to 1. This
simplifies logic in a few other places, e.g. RdeDomainImportAction.
I verified in BigQuery that no DomainBases exist with extendedRegistrationYears
values that aren't either null or equal to 1. At some point we should remove
the persisted fields from datastore via e.g. resaving all those domains, but
it's low priority and can wait until we have some more pressing migration.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=150373897
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/model/transfer/TransferData.java (Browse further)
