This is in preparation for running the automatic refactoring script that
will replace all ExpectedExceptions with use of JUnit 4.13's assertThrows/
expectThrows.
Note that I have recorded the callsites of assertions about EppExceptions
being marshallable and will edit those specific assertions back in after
running the automatic refactoring script (which do not understand these).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=178812403
The only remaining methods on ExceptionRule after this are methods that
also exist on ExpectedException, which will allow us to, in the next CL,
swap out the one for the other and then run the automated refactoring to
turn it all into assertThrows/expectThrows.
Note that there were some assertions about root causes that couldn't
easily be turned into ExpectedException invocations, so I simply
converted them directly to usages of assertThrows/expectThrows.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=178623431
Also - remove logging from TransactNew, to prevent double logging on transient
failures (TransactNew retries on failure)
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=172500772
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
Sometimes requests "die" suddenly, without going through catch/finally blocks.
If this happens, any lock they own will remain locked until it times out (which
can take hours in some cases).
This cl implicitly unlocks any lock if the owner of the lock isn't running
anymore.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=168880938
It was buggy (didn't work) and was never actually used.
Why never actually used: for it to be used executeWithLock has to be called
with different requesters on the same lockId. That never happend in the code.
How it was buggy: Logically, the queue is deleted on release of the lock (meaning it was
meaningless the only time it mattered - when the lock isn't taken). In
addition, a different bug meant that having items in the queue prevented the
lock from being released forcing all other tasks to have to wait for lock
timeout even if the task that acquired the lock is long done.
Alternative: fix the queue. This would mean we don't want to delete the lock on release (since we want to keep the queue). Instead, we resave the same lock with expiration date being START_OF_TIME. In addition - we need to fix the .equals used to determine if the lock the same as the acquired lock - instead use some isSame function that ignores the queue.
Note: the queue is dangerous! An item (calling class / action) in the first place of a queue means no other calling class can get that lock. Everything is waiting for the first calling class to be re-run - but that might take a long time (depending on that action's rerun policy) and even might never happen (if for some reason that action decided it was no longer needed without acquiring the lock) - causing all other actions to stall forever!
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=163705463
I'm working on some changes to XsrfTokenManager (b/35388772) and ServerSecret
was crufty enough that I ended up rewriting it. Now it uses a LoadingCache
with a transaction instead of needlessly race-condition-y static init logic.
It also now supports retrieving its value as either a UUID (the old format
used by XsrfTokenManager) or a byte[]. The latter is more flexible and can
be directly used with HMAC which the new XsrfTokenManager format will employ.
And lastly, I added tests. In addition, I tested this code on alpha and
verified appropriate operation (XSRF tokens still work from the console and
from regtool; if you remove ServerSecret from datastore and memcache, it
persists a new one).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=148931620
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
