Last commit did not pick up all the changes because MOE incorrectly attributed some changes to the wrong commit. This commit should reconcile these. Also picked up some changes to how hamcrest library is depended upon in BUILD file, which should have been included in previous commits.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=177637931
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
This moves us from the oudated google/data XML api to the OnePlatform REST/JSON api, finally silencing the deprecation warnings we've been seeing.
The synchronization algorithm diffs the spreadsheet's current values with its internally sourced values, adding the row to a batch update request if there's a discrepancy. Additional internal data are added as an append operation to the end of the sheet, and any extraneous spreadsheet data is cleared from the spreadsheet.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=169273590
We create an injectable LockHandler that just calls the static
Lock.executeWithLocks function.
I'm not sure what's the correct place to put the LockHandler. I think
model/server is only appropriate for the actual datastore lock. This is a "per request" lock, so maybe request/lock?
-----------------------------
This is the initial step in adding the "lock implicitly released on request death" feature, but it's also useful on its own - easier to test Actions when we can use a fake lock.
To keep this CL simple, we keep using the old Lock as is in most places. We just choose a single example to convert to LockHandler to showcase it. Converting all other uses will be in a subsequent CL.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=167357564
It was buggy (didn't work) and was never actually used.
Why never actually used: for it to be used executeWithLock has to be called
with different requesters on the same lockId. That never happend in the code.
How it was buggy: Logically, the queue is deleted on release of the lock (meaning it was
meaningless the only time it mattered - when the lock isn't taken). In
addition, a different bug meant that having items in the queue prevented the
lock from being released forcing all other tasks to have to wait for lock
timeout even if the task that acquired the lock is long done.
Alternative: fix the queue. This would mean we don't want to delete the lock on release (since we want to keep the queue). Instead, we resave the same lock with expiration date being START_OF_TIME. In addition - we need to fix the .equals used to determine if the lock the same as the acquired lock - instead use some isSame function that ignores the queue.
Note: the queue is dangerous! An item (calling class / action) in the first place of a queue means no other calling class can get that lock. Everything is waiting for the first calling class to be re-run - but that might take a long time (depending on that action's rerun policy) and even might never happen (if for some reason that action decided it was no longer needed without acquiring the lock) - causing all other actions to stall forever!
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=163705463
The billing account map will be serialized in the following format:
{currency1=id1, currency2=id2, ...}
In order for the output to be deterministic, the billing account map is stored as a sorted map.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=161075814
The absence of these fields causes RDE failures, so they are in effect
required on any functioning registry system. We are currently
experiencing problems in sandbox caused by null values on these fields.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=155474895
Also added corresponding getters and setters for the new field. Note that
nothing has changed on the RDAP front for now, as the CL&D only concerns WHOIS.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=155116134
We are now ready to begin configuration using YAML, mediated by ConfigModule.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143818507
The next step will be to get rid of RegistryConfig descendants and RegistryConfigLoader entirely.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143812815
This doesn't change the end result of a successful run, though this is what a typical flow looks like prior to this fix:
Consider a sheet with 10 data rows (+ 1 header row = 11). A 10-row data set will call worksheet.setRowCount(10), which truncates the last row of the existing sheet. This row will eventually be added again in the last for loop, but if the synchronizer fails mid-sync, this last row will remain dropped. This fix will prevent this last row from being dropped.
This doesn't fix the broader issue of SheetSynchronizer not behaving transactionally -- that's a different can of worms.
See the linked bug for an instance where the synchronizer failed mid-run and dropped a data row as a result.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136398109
It's best to be consistent and use the same thing everywhere. "clientId" was
already used in more places and is shorter and no more ambiguous, so it's the
logical one to win out.
Note that this CL is almost solely a big Eclipse-assisted refactoring. There are
two places that I did not change clientIdentifier -- the actual entity field on
Registrar (though I did change all getters and setters), and the name of a
column on the exported registrar spreadsheet. Both would require data
migrations.
Also fixes a few minor nits discovered in touched files, including an incorrect
test in OfyFilterTest.java and some superfluous uses of String.format() when
calling checkArgument().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133956465
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
