Now that transfers are always restricted to 1 year, it's unnecessary to store
extendedRegistrationYears on TransferData - it will always be equal to 1. This
simplifies logic in a few other places, e.g. RdeDomainImportAction.
I verified in BigQuery that no DomainBases exist with extendedRegistrationYears
values that aren't either null or equal to 1. At some point we should remove
the persisted fields from datastore via e.g. resaving all those domains, but
it's low priority and can wait until we have some more pressing migration.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=150373897
This CL restricts domain transfer pricing lookups (on domain check and info) to
only support a 1-year period for inquiring about transfer fees. That treatment
matches what we do for domain restores, which are also always one year. This is
a followup to [] which disallowed actual transfer request flows from
specifying multi-year periods.
Since it's no longer necessary, this CL also changes the domain transfer pricing
logic to drop the years parameter, including removing the parameter from the
custom pricing logic TransferPriceParameters object.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=150367839
This tweaks the logic that prohibits domain renews during pending transfers to just use the regular verifyNoDisallowedStatuses() check instead of a special check on TransferData with a custom exception. This is simpler and produces a better error message: we get "Operation disallowed by status: pendingTransfer" instead of "Object with given ID (foo.com) already has a pending transfer" (which is intended for use when denying a transfer request for an object already being transferred, not for this case).
For the record, we originally prohibited renews for domains in pending transfer because there's no good reason to do such a renew: b/12533793. But in fact our transfer server-approve logic relies heavily on this behavior, because otherwise the domain's expiration time computed in cloneProjectedAtTime() will reflect the transfer year added to the post-renew expiration time, whereas all the transfer server approve entities (e.g. new autorenew billing event) will reflect the pre-renew expiration time at the moment the transfer was requested. As such, it would be quite difficult to ever support a renew during pending transfer, since it would need to change many fields within the transfer server approve entities.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=150325501
We were using verifyHasPendingTransfer() only in the domain transfer flows; now we use it in both. I also added a helper verifyTransferInitiator() even though it's only used in two places (the transfer cancel flows), because I think it streamlines the flow and makes it more consistent with the whole section of verification checking.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=150324823
It turns out that this ICANN policy appears to prohibit transfers with
registration extensions other than 1 year (section A.8):
https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/policy-2012-03-07-en
This is backed up by the practical fact that we've never seen a registrar
request a transfer for any period other than one year.
And removing the support for multi-year transfers vastly simplifies
transfer logic and eliminates a bunch of annoying corner cases. Users
still can achieve the same thing by doing a 1-year transfer plus a
manual renewal afterwards for the remainder of the desired extension.
This change leaves in place lots of infrastructure to support multi-year
transfers that is now obsolete (e.g. TransferData.extendedRegistrationYears).
This should all be cleaned up, but it's a lower priority than fixing the
gap itself and insulating ourselves against needing to handle any real
multi-year transfer case. Once this CL goes in, we can start ignoring
extendedRegistrationYears entirely because it'll always be 1 year, which
makes the cleanup process easier.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=150212864
Instead of only returning the most severe one, return all applicable ones. This is because the reserved list has grown to a list of types that are not strictly comparable but orthogonal to each other. We can no longer depend on the fact that the most severe type incorporates all properties of those beneath it. Therefore returning all of them and treat them one by one in the calling site is the correct behavior.
Due to constraint imposed in eppcom.xsd, during domain checks the response can only contain a reservation reason of fewer than 32 characters, therefore we are returning the message for the type with highest severity, in case of multiple reservation types for a label.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149776106
In fact, completely eviscerate cloneProjectedAtTime (to be removed in
a followup CL) in favor of doing the projection of transfers and the
loading of values from the superordinate domain at call sites. This
is one of the issues that blocked the memcache audit work, since the
load inside of cloneProjectedAtTime could not be controlled by the
caller.
Note: fixed a minor bug where a subordinate host created after its superordinate domain was last transferred should have lastTransferTime==null but was previously reporting the domain's lastTransferTime.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149769125
This fixes longstanding bug b/19430703 in which domain transfers that were
server-approved would only handle the autorenew grace period correctly if
the autorenew grace period was going to start within the transfer window.
If the autorenew grace period was already active (e.g. the domain had
recently autorenewed, before the transfer was requested), the logic would
miss it, even if it was going to be active throughout the transfer window
(i.e. it would still be active at the server-approval time).
When the autorenew grace period is active at the time a transfer is approved
(whether by the server or explicitly via DomainTransferApproveFlow), the
correct behavior is to essentially "cancel" the autorenew - the losing registrar
receives a refund for the autorenew charge, and the gaining registrar's transfer
extended registration years are applied to the expiration time as it was prior
to that autorenew. The way we implement this is that we just have the transfer
essentially "subsume" the autorenew - we deduct 1 year from the transfer's
extended registration years before extending the registration period from what
the expiration time is post-autorenew at the moment of transfer approval.
See b/19430703#comment17 for details on the policy justification; the only real
ICANN document about this is https://www.icann.org/news/advisory-2002-06-06-en,
but registrars informally document in many places that transfers will trigger
autorenew grace, e.g. see https://support.google.com/domains/answer/3251236
There are still a few parts of this bug that remain unfixed:
1) RdeDomainImportAction repeats a lot of logic when handling imported domains
that are in pending transfer, so it will also need to address this case in
some way, but the policy choices there are unclear so I'm waiting until we
know more about RDE import goals to figure out how to fix that.
2) Behavior at the millisecond edge cases is inconsistent - specifically, for
the case where a transfer is requested such that the automatic transfer
time is exactly the domain's expiration time (down to the millisecond),
the correct behavior is a little unclear and this CL for now ignores this
issue in favor of getting a fix for 99.999% of the issue into prod. See
newly created b/35881941 for the gory details.
Also, there are parts of this bug that will be fixed as parts of either
b/25084229 (transfer exDate computations) or b/35110537 (disallowing transfers
with extended registration years other than 1), both of which are less pressing.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149024269
This documents some slightly spooky behavior around domains that have an expiration time within their pendingDelete window (meaning the whole period from DomainDeleteFlow running to the actual deletionTime, not just the 5-day pendingDelete grace period). They will experience an autorenew in terms of expiration time and grace period status due to cloneProjectedAtTime(), but without the usual artifacts of an autorenew (billing event and poll message).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149019980
For constant field declarations, you should use the immutable type (such as ImmutableList) instead of the general collection interface type (such as List). This communicates to your callers important semantic guarantees ([]
This change replaces constants (static final CONSTNAT_CASE) declaration type which use the general collection interface (e.g. List) with an immutable type (e.g. ImmutableList).
For more info, see: []
Cleanup change automatically generated by javacflume/refactory
Refactoring: //third_party/java_src/error_prone/project/core/src/main/java/com/google/errorprone/bugpatterns:MutableConstantField_refactoring
Tested:
TAP --sample for global presubmit queue
[]
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=149010021
These methods will also be used for RDE imports (in a follow-up).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=146955581
Warning: This is a breaking change to custom logic for domain info.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=146033749
This was used in DomainInfoFlow to return a DomainResource with no
nameservers without making INACTIVE show up. It was nominally used
in DomainApplicationInfoFlow for the same reason, but that's just
an artifact of the old flow hierarchy since applications never have
INACTIVE set anyways. In either case, now that we have the DomainInfo
return object instead of returning DomainResource directly from the
flow, it's better handled within the flow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=145582317
This also bypasses signed mark validation during domain creation if
the flow is being executed as superuser.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=145435268
This is probably best from a code-cleanliness perspective anyways,
but the rationale is that tightly coupling the resources to the
info responses was a straightjacket that required all status
values and fields to be directly available on the resource. With
this change, I already was able to get rid of the preMarshal()
hackery, and I will be able to get rid of cloneWithLinkedStatus()
and most of the contents of cloneProjectedAtTime() for non-domains.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=144252924
This is the follow up PR for #49. It adds an additional parameter to DomainCreateFlowCustomLogic.AfterValidationParameters: a nullable signed mark id.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143966945
This is the final preparatory step necessary in order to load and load
configuration from YAML in a static context and then provide it either via
Dagger (using ConfigModule) or through RegistryConfig's existing static
functions.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143819983
Custom logic to block domain labels is currently being implemented in 'Before Save'. At that point, the default flow has already validated the SMD, premium, and reserved. Only then can we determine if we should block the label, so the 'After Validation' extension point doesn't currently fit the need.
However, as a result, if the label is blocked, but the fee extension is missing, a generic fee error is thrown, stating the fee extension must be present. We would rather state that the label is blocked. Then, if the SMD is present, we override the block, validate that the fee is present with the correct price, and allow the domain create.
The solution is to move the 'After Validation' extension point to actually be after all validation, including of the SMD, but before the fee check.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143790163
This CL adds an otherClientId field to be populated on domain transfers with client ID of the other end of the transaction (losing registrar for requests and cancels, gaining registrar for approves and rejects). This will be used for reporting in compliance with specification 3 of the ICANN registry agreement.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143775945
This is a necessary prerequisite to subsequently injecting the configuration
dependencies.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143567753
This is the first in a decently long series of commits to delete RegistryConfig
entirely and centralize all configuration in ConfigModule using Dagger. Once
this is done, then the text-based YAML configuration work can begin in earnest.
Note that the configuration settings from TestRegistryConfig will be moving
into ConfigModule.LocalTestConfig. This way they can be referred to in a static
context from test and test utility helpers, rather than having to be injected
everywhere, which we don't typically bother with for tests.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143473089
It can always be brought back if we find an actual use case for it, but for now, it shouldn't be in the standard distribution given that it has no users.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143044153
Also adds a mechanism to ensure that fee extensions are included when custom
pricing logic adds a custom fee, and fixes up the domain restore flow to
properly use the restore price.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142715136
This also adds a domain update pricing hook to DomainPricingCustomLogic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142286755
Previously DomainPricingCustomLogic#customizeCreatePrice takes in the create
price itself and modifies it. Change it to take in the entire FeesAndCredits (previously named EppCommandOperations) which may contain other fees related to domain creation,
such as EAP fees, and returns FeesAndCredits that may either change the
fees or add new type of fees.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=141600614
A previous CL inadvertently caused the system to always set the transfer status to SERVER_CANCELLED when deleting a resource, even if there was no transfer. This led to RDE problems.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140890919
This addresses an issue where the existing logic assumed that the presence of a
signed mark means the current flow is a sunrise/sunrush request, when this isn't
necessarily true. It's safe to ignore signed marks in other circumstances.
This is a combination of work by Justin Graham <justin.af.graham@gmail.com>,
Nick Felt, and me (Ben). It is based on the original PR located at:
https://github.com/google/nomulus/pull/41
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140784461
Swap all calls to TldSpecificLogicProxy.getCreatePrice() to the counterpart in
DomainPricingLogic. Also makes necessary changes for testing to work, including
fake implementations of DomainPricingCustomLogic and
DomainCreateLofwCustomLogic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140754334
By refactoring TldSpecificLogicProxy (and renaming it to DomainPricingLogic) into
a FlowScope object that is injected into each flow, we can further inject a
DomainPricingCustomLogic into the pricer, which has hooks into each pricing
calls, e. g. getCreatePrice(), getRenewPrice(), etc.
The benefit of these customization hooks is that methods like getCreatePrice()
get called in multiple flows, such as DomainAllocateFlow,
DomainApplicationCreateFlow, and DomainCreateFlow. By customizing the return
value of getCreatePrice() itself, all of its callers gets the amended price.
This CL only includes the basic infrastructure needed, with no actual hooks
placed into each flow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140616990
This also adds a TODO in DomainCheckFlow to document the fact that as-of date is not overridden when passed to the custom logic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=140031318
This also adds beforeValidation hook to DomainCreateCustomFlow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139828346
Currently we pass in null. However, from the spec:
<domain:acDate> element that contains the date and time of a
required or completed response. For a PENDING request, the value
identifies the date and time by which a response is required
before an automated response action will be taken by the server.
For all other status types, the value identifies the date and time
when the request was completed."
- https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5731#page-16, section 3.1.3
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139363370
This also fixes up a hook on the domain create flow custom logic to use a single
parameter, which is the general pattern we want to use going forward. It also
establishes a pattern for custom logic being able to add extensions.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139362230
The callsites were inconsistent between whether they were passing empty list or
null, and many of the ones that were passing null were not correctly annotated
with @Nullable. I'm now going with empty list throughout except for the final
step where the actual field that will be transformed into XML is set, where it
is coerced to null to avoid an empty element in the XML output.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139340837
To add additional logic for flow code, write custom classes that extend the existing custom logic classes (of which DomainCreateFlowCustomLogic is the first provided example), along with a class that extends CustomLogicFactory to provide instances of the new custom logic classes. Then configure the fully qualified class name of your new custom logic factory in ConfigModule.provideCustomLogicFactoryClass().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139221577