This provides a safeguard against using TypeInstantiator to resolve the component class, where if resolution is done incorrectly, you end up with java.lang.Object. Formerly, that would have "succeeded" in generating a Router for Object, which of course has no methods that return @Action classes. Such a router is pretty useless, so it's better to make Router stricter and have it fail if you give it such a class by accident.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=148353224
It turns out this type parameter was never necessary. A builder only needs the reflexive second type parameter when you want to have a builder inheritance hierarchy where the descendant builders have methods that the ancestor builder doesn't. In that case, the type param enables the ancestor builder's setter methods to automatically return the correct derived type, so that if you start with a derived builder, you can call a setter method inherited from an ancestor and then continue the chain with setters from the derived builder (e.g. new ContactResource.Builder().setCreationTime(now).setContactId(), which otherwise would have returned an EppResource.Builder from setCreationTime(), at which point the call to setContactId() would not compile).
Even then, it's not strictly necessary to use the type parameter, since you could instead just have each derived type override every inherited method to specify itself as the return type. But that would be a lot of extra boilerplate and brittleness.
Anyway, in this case, there is a builder hierarchy, but RequestComponentBuilder specifies all the methods that we're ever going to want on our builders, so there's never any need to be able to call specific derived builder methods. We only even need the individual builder classes so that Dagger can generate them separately for each component.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=148269178
The one-day validity period is also moved from the caller into XsrfTokenManager.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=147857716
No actual injection is happening in test, and at least some compilers complain that @Inject qualifiers are not allowed on non-static inner classes.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=147835985
We're now using java_import_external instead of maven_jar. This allows
us to specify the relationships between jars, thereby allowing us to
eliminate scores of vendor BUILD files that did nothing but re-export
@foo//jar targets, thus addressing the concerns of djhworld on Hacker
News: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12738072
We now have redundant failover mirrors, which is a feature I added to
Bazel 0.4.2 in ed7ced0018
A new standard naming convention is now being used for all Maven repos.
Those names are calculated from the group_artifact name using the
following algorithm that eliminates redundancy:
https://gist.github.com/jart/41bfd977b913c2301627162f1c038e55
The JSR330 dep has been removed from java targets if they also depend
on Dagger, since Dagger always exports JSR330.
Annotation processor dependencies should now be leaner and meaner, by
more appropriately managing what needs to be on the classpath at
runtime. This should trim down the production jar by >1MB. As it stands
currently in the open source world:
- backend_jar_deploy.jar: 50MB
- frontend_jar_deploy.jar: 30MB
- tools_jar_deploy.jar: 45MB
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=143487929
This refactors RequestHandler so that it handles the construction of the request
component itself, rather than being handed a pre-built request component
instance constructed by the invoking servlet.
The motivation for this change is so that RequestHandler can be extended in
future CLs to compute authentication results, and can provide those results as
an available binding in the constructed request component. An alternative
approach could have been to compute the authentication results within
RequestModule itself, but I think it's clearer to keep business logic like
that outside of Dagger providers.
This CL makes the following individual changes:
- Adds request component builders, which implement a RequestComponentBuilder
interface so they can all be manipulated by RequestHandler
- Instead of obtaining request components via factory methods on the global
components, one now can have global-scoped bindings just inject the request
component builders (which requires adding a module to each global component
declaring the subcomponent). This follows the recommended approach here:
http://google.github.io/dagger/subcomponents.html
- Instead of exposing request components on the global component interface,
we now expose module-specific subclasses of RequestHandler that @Inject the
appropriate request component builder's provider and pass it to the superclass
(note that inheritance isn't strictly necessary here but saves boilerplate)
- RequestHandler now takes the Provider<RequestComponentBuilder> and builds
the component itself using its own fresh RequestModule instance. This provides
some nice encapsulation but is mainly needed for adding a RequestAuthModule
in future work.
- RequestHandler also takes UserService now, which can be provided via Dagger
by the subclass. Longer-term that will go away in favor of instead providing
AuthStrategy instances, some of which will use UserService internally.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=138815648
This change moves the reflective setAccessible() calls on the request component
methods (needed so that they can be invoked reflectively from RequestHandler)
to within Router itself, eliminating the need to manually call this from each
Servlet class and then pass in the resulting Method objects. Instead, we just
pass in the request component class and let Router do the rest.
Old comments say that cross-package reflection is not allowed on AppEngine, but
while it's quite possible this was once the case, I can't reproduce that
limitation, and the documentation seems to contradict any such restriction:
"""
An application is allowed full, unrestricted, reflective access to its own
classes. It can query any private members, call the method
java.lang.reflect.AccessibleObject.setAccessible(), and read/set private
members.
"""
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/runtime#reflection
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=138693006
Convert to an action and remove ResourceServlet, JsonTransportServlet and
JsonTransportServlet, all of which exist only to support it.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137519385
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
