It's best to be consistent and use the same thing everywhere. "clientId" was
already used in more places and is shorter and no more ambiguous, so it's the
logical one to win out.
Note that this CL is almost solely a big Eclipse-assisted refactoring. There are
two places that I did not change clientIdentifier -- the actual entity field on
Registrar (though I did change all getters and setters), and the name of a
column on the exported registrar spreadsheet. Both would require data
migrations.
Also fixes a few minor nits discovered in touched files, including an incorrect
test in OfyFilterTest.java and some superfluous uses of String.format() when
calling checkArgument().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133956465
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
The load tests used to directly build EPP, but that becomes
problematic for an upcoming CL that refactors a lot of the
EPP flow code. Instead, use the existing tool endpoint
(conveniently, LoadTestAction is already in the tools module).
This required changing the EppToolServlet to get its
xml from a param rather than from the request payload,
since task queues won't allow both a payload and request
params on the same task.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=124351878
ReferenceUnion is a hack to work around the mismatch between how
we store references (by roid) and how they are represented in EPP
(by foreign key). If it ever needed to exist (not entirely clear...)
it should have remained tightly scoped within the domain commands
and resources. Instead it has leaked everywhere in the project,
causing lots of boilerplate. This CL hides all of that behind
standard Refs, and should be followed by work to remove ReferenceUnion
completely.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=122424416
The tool needs to:
* Replace all hosts on a domain with a provided set of hosts
* Add 3 server locks to the domain
* Print an undo command that restores the domain to its original state
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=121944934
