Right now, DomainApplicationCreateFlow checks to make sure that the registration period is in years, but doesn't store it in the DomainApplication explicitly. Instead, when DomainAllocateFlow runs later, it goes back to the XML in the HistoryEntry to get the number of years. Corey suggests that it would be cleaner to store the number of years in the DomainApplication. This is stage one of a data migration; we store the value, but don't actually read it anywhere except in tests. If we have any outstanding domain applications, we will then need to write a scrap tool to populate the years field, after which we can start relying on the field.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137317739
We already had methods to return just the create or just the renew price. I added more to return just the premium flag or just the fee class.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136833071
The renew flow was still using PricingEngineProxy directly, meaning that it did not pick up on any TLD-specific pricing logic. Fixed this, and added tests to make sure.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136757922
There are no applications extant that predate the creationTrid field.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136047561
This is to better distinguish between an LRP "token" (the string passed along in EPP) and the datastore entity that contains the token and all metadata.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135943480
aka regexing for fun and profit.
This also makes sure that there are no statements after the
throwing statement, since these would be dead code. There
were a surprising number of places with assertions after
the throw, and none of these are actually triggered in tests
ever. When I found these, I replaced them with try/catch/rethrow
which makes the assertions actually happen:
before:
// This is the ExceptionRule that checks EppException marshaling
thrown.expect(FooException.class);
doThrowingThing();
assertSomething(); // Dead code!
after:
try {
doThrowingThing();
assertWithMessage("...").fail();
} catch (FooException e) {
assertSomething();
// For EppExceptions:
assertAboutEppExceptins().that(e).marshalsToXml();
}
To make this work, I added EppExceptionSubject.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135793407
Very few flows actually check the phase. Push the checks down to the leaf
flows so that we can remove the inherited code from ResourceFlow and replace
it with utility methods. In the process, document and test two places that
throw the exception but did not previously test it.
This introduces a temporary hack in BaseDomainCreateFlow that does something
specific for DomainApplicationCreateFlow. It will go away literally tomorrow
when I flatten that flow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135480538
This is how it should be in every test, but we used to not be
so careful about this. I had to touch this file anyways, so
I fixed it here.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135387267
Almost all uses were in test classes, which I replaced with clock.nowUTC().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134993149
TestExtraLogicManager is pretty kludgy, and should be replaced with injection, mocking, etc. But in the meantime, using a dedicated error to signal its success, rather than IllegalArgumentException as was done before, at least makes things a little easier to follow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134832315
This CL fixes a bug introduced in [] which caused an exception to be thrown when an attempt was made to update a domain without a fee extension, even if the update was free, as it usually is. The fee extension should only be required if the update is not free.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134830250
They were taking a DateTime "now", which would seem like it would be the time of
when the resource was deleted, but it was actually the time by which the
resource was deleted, with the actual deletion time being hardcoded to a day
prior. The confusion was evident because a fair number of tests were passing
the wrong thing. I renamed the parameter "deletionTime" to make it exactly
clear what it's doing and fixed up some callsites where necessary.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134818032
This was added in [] but is not actually necessary - the exDate
in the EppOutput is already checked by the response XML comparison step.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134296246
The reason field is 1:1 mapped to skus in billing reports. Need to add a new reason for EAP for this type of billing event for reporting to work correctly. Also map that reason to the correct SKU.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134005364
When custom effective date is passed in the check command, the response should
contain that date as an acknowledgemant that the check is performed at a time
different from now.
Also when the fee(s) returned contains a validDateRange (i. e. EAP fees that
are only valid during a certain period), the response will contain a notAfter
field which is the date after which the quoted fee(s) are no longer valid. (i.
e. the earliest of the end dates of all fees that would expire.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133989775
These were historically separate due to the old flow
structure, but now they should be one exception.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133984858
It is replaced by loadByForeignKey(), which does the same thing that
loadByUniqueId() did for contacts, hosts, and domains, and also
loadDomainApplication(), which loads domain application by ROID. This eliminates
the ugly mode-switching of attemping to load by other foreign key or ROID.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133980156
Also pull out a small bit of common functionality across contact and host checks.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133977324
It's best to be consistent and use the same thing everywhere. "clientId" was
already used in more places and is shorter and no more ambiguous, so it's the
logical one to win out.
Note that this CL is almost solely a big Eclipse-assisted refactoring. There are
two places that I did not change clientIdentifier -- the actual entity field on
Registrar (though I did change all getters and setters), and the name of a
column on the exported registrar spreadsheet. Both would require data
migrations.
Also fixes a few minor nits discovered in touched files, including an incorrect
test in OfyFilterTest.java and some superfluous uses of String.format() when
calling checkArgument().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133956465
Currently EapFee is a separate class that has no inheritance from either
BaseFee and Fee. With this CL its functionality is merged into the Fee class
and the type of the fee can be identified by the FeeType enum in the Fee class.
Future custom fees can follow the same pattern.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133627570
Added support to specify custom effective date to run the fee check command.
Such functionality is useful for TLDs with creation price as a function of
time, such as those with EAP. However the implementation is not limited EAP or
create price check. Any fee check can specify a date, as long as its XML schema
supports a date.
Currently conforming to fee extension v12, subject to schema changes.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133420255
While working on an implementation of TLD-specific logic, it was realized that the extra logic methods would need access to the flow's HistoryEntry, so that things like poll messages could be parented properly.
Also, the update flow had not been fixed to perform the fee check.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132561527
This CL enhances various domain flows (check, create, delete, renew, restore, transfer, update) so that they invoke the appropriate methods on the object implementing the TLD's RegistryExtraFlowLogic (if any). TldSpecificLogicProxy is also updated to invoke RegistryExtraFlowLogic proxy (if any) to fetch the appropriate price. The tests use a made-up extra flow logic object which can be attached to a test TLD to make sure that the proper routines are being invoked.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132486734
When EAP is involed we current have one billing event for domain create that
has the create fee and EAP fee lumped together. Change it to record two
separate billing events for each.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132335349
It's better that it always takes a non-null ImmutableSet, which may either be
empty or contain elements. That way the ugliness of nullness is contained
just to the entity class itself, and all other code that interacts with it
can always be assured of having a real set to deal with.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132066238
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
