Registrars that are PENDING or SUSPENDED should not have access to
EPP commands that cost money, as in either case it's not likely we'd
actually be able to get payment from said registrar. For this reason
we already prevented access to the domain create flow for non-active
registrars. This commit extends that to other commands that cost
money, including renewals, restores, and transfer requests.
Note that implicit autorenews will still occur for suspended
registrars, as in our point-in-time data model there's no good way
to prevent them. So when a registrar is suspended for non-payment,
the game plan is to get all of their domains transferred out to a
registrar that will pay as soon as possible.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=223173677
This simplifies calculating the overall invoice by giving RESTORE fees a
period equal to the period of the associated RENEW (1 year). Older
BillingEvents will not be backfilled, and will have periodYears = null.
Invoicing and business both agree this is a valid representation, since RESTORE fees are intrinsically tied to the 1-year RENEW it's associated with.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=188041777
When enabled for a registrar, all EPP operations on premium domains that have
costs (e.g. creates, renews, transfers) will fail unless the EPP fee extension
is used to explicitly ack the amount of fee as part of the EPP transaction.
This ack is required regardless of whether premium fee acking is required at
the registry level. No data migration is necessary since false is the desired
default for this new attribute.
This CL also contains some slight refactoring of static utility methods used to
perform fee verification; there was short-circuiting at call-sites in two
places when what was really needed was two methods, one implementing additional
functionality on top of the other, and calling the inner method in the places
where short-circuiting had previously been necessary.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=184229363
This was a surprisingly involved change. Some of the difficulties included
java.util.Optional purposely not being Serializable (so I had to move a
few Optionals in mapreduce classes to @Nullable) and having to add the Truth
Java8 extension library for assertion support.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=171863777
After working further with domain deletes, I realized we'll need to record multiple reportingTimes under a single historyEntry when issuing a -1 counter to cancel grace-period adds. Since the TLD would be the only shared component within a record, we'll just duplicate it across all records to save an unnecessary layer of hierarchy.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=166261413
This is the second of many cls adding explicit logging in all our domain
mutation flows to facilitate transaction reporting.
Adds and renews each result in a +1 counter for the NET_ADDS/RENEWS_#_YR field,
which I've added simple (# of years, add or renew) -> Enum functions to get.
Allocates are just a special case of adds, and are counted in a similar manner.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=165963249
This is the first of many cls adding explicit logging in all our domain mutation flows to facilitate transaction reporting.
Restores are relatively simple- it happens immediately, so the reporting time is just the time of the HistoryEntry, and we add a single "RESTORED_DOMAINS" count of 1.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=165639084
The --superuser command in the nomulus command-line tool should be
bypassing checks on whether the passed-in registrar client ID has access
to the TLD in question, but currently it is not.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=158974462
As part of b/36599833, this makes FlowRunner log the appropriate ICANN activity
report field name for each flow it runs as part of a structured JSON log
statement which can be parsed to generate ICANN activity reports (under the key
"icannActivityReportField").
In order to support this, we introduce an annotation for Flow classes called
@ReportingSpec and a corresponding enum of values for this annotation, which is
IcannReportingTypes.ActivityReportField, that stores the mapping of constant
enum values to field names.
The mapping from flows to fields is fairly obvious, with three exceptions:
- Application flows are all accounted under domains, since applications are
technically just deferred domain creates within the EPP protocol
- ClaimsCheckFlow is counted as a domain check
- DomainAllocateFlow is counted as a domain create
In addition, I've added tests to all the corresponding flows that we are
indeed logging what we expect.
We'll also need to log the TLD for this to be useful, but I'm doing that in a
follow-up CL.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=151283411
Also adds a mechanism to ensure that fee extensions are included when custom
pricing logic adds a custom fee, and fixes up the domain restore flow to
properly use the restore price.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142715136
This also adds a domain update pricing hook to DomainPricingCustomLogic.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142286755
The callsites were inconsistent between whether they were passing empty list or
null, and many of the ones that were passing null were not correctly annotated
with @Nullable. I'm now going with empty list throughout except for the final
step where the actual field that will be transformed into XML is set, where it
is coerced to null to avoid an empty element in the XML output.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139340837
I added shared base classes to all of the Fee extension types that
make it possible to fully ignore the version in the flows. (You
ask for a FeeCreateCommandExtension, for example, and you get one
without having to worry about which). This is an improvement over
the old code that asked you to provide a list of possible fee
extensions and then ask for the first one in preference order.
As part of this I was able to make the Fee implementation a bit
simpler as well.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137992390
1) Don't do ofy().load() inside a model class (in DomainAuthInfo)
2) Move the one use of verify into the one caller in ResourceFlowUtils
3) Hosts don't support authInfo, so remove useless code
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137984809
This concludes your flow flattening experience. Please
fill out a flow flattening satisfaction survey before
exiting.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137903095
Now that the flows are flattened, the commitAdditionalLogicChanges() call, which used to come later in the flow to actually save the Datastore objects, is now happening right after the performAdditionalXXXLogic() call. So we can instead just do the saves in performAdditionalXXXLogic(), and get rid of the separate call. As a first step, this CL simply makes commitAdditionalLogicChanges() a private method that gets called internally by the extra logic manager. Later, we can move the saves into their proper position, affecting only the extra logic class itself.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137529991
These were historically separate due to the old flow
structure, but now they should be one exception.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133984858
While working on an implementation of TLD-specific logic, it was realized that the extra logic methods would need access to the flow's HistoryEntry, so that things like poll messages could be parented properly.
Also, the update flow had not been fixed to perform the fee check.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132561527
This CL enhances various domain flows (check, create, delete, renew, restore, transfer, update) so that they invoke the appropriate methods on the object implementing the TLD's RegistryExtraFlowLogic (if any). TldSpecificLogicProxy is also updated to invoke RegistryExtraFlowLogic proxy (if any) to fetch the appropriate price. The tests use a made-up extra flow logic object which can be attached to a test TLD to make sure that the proper routines are being invoked.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132486734
When EAP is involed we current have one billing event for domain create that
has the create fee and EAP fee lumped together. Change it to record two
separate billing events for each.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132335349
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
We want to support multiple versions of the fee extension, to allow new features while maintaining backward compatibility. This CL extends the framework and adds one new version, 0.11 (spec version 7), to the existing version 0.6 (spec version 3). A follow-on CL will add version 0.12 (spec version 8).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=127849044
Daggerizes all of the EPP flows. This does not change anything yet
about the flows themselves, just how they are invoked, but after
this CL it's safe to @Inject things into flow classes.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=125382478
Superuser should only be settable via the tool (see []
which is merged in here but not diffbased, and which removes
the implicit superuser for CharlestonRoad). It is a property
of the request, not of the session (there are no sessions in the tool).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=125204707
This refactors the existing premium list functionality into the new
class StaticPremiumListPricingEngine, which implements PricingEngine.
A backfill @OnLoad is provided to default existing Registry entities
into the static implementation. For now there is just this one
implementation. Dagger map multibinding is used to generate the total
set of allowed pricing engines, and allows other parties to plug in
their own implementations.
The pricing engine is a required field on the Registry object. If you
don't want a particular Registry to actually have a premium list, then
use the static pricing engine but don't actually set a premium list.
A subsequent CL will refactor the Key<PremiumList> field on the
Registry entity class to be handled solely by the
StaticPremiumListPricingEngine implementation. Going forward, all
configuration and implementation details that are specific to a given
pricing engine should be handled by that pricing engine, and not as
fields on the Registry object.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=121850176
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/flows/domain/DomainRestoreRequestFlow.java (Browse further)
