By moving []s into the batch package, which is not included in the frontend service, we pave the way to remove the dependency of frontend on the [] library.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=142265351
HostResource and DomainApplication are not transferable, (or at
least, not directly in the case of hosts) and have no need for
the TransferData field. In a flat-flow world, we can push it down
to where it's actually used.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=139201423
The default is to support GET, which doesn't work with cron fanout which only
uses POST.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134284855
This change replaces all Ref objects in the code with Key objects. These are
stored in datastore as the same object (raw datastore keys), so this is not
a model change.
Our best practices doc says to use Keys not Refs because:
* The .get() method obscures what's actually going on
- Much harder to visually audit the code for datastore loads
- Hard to distinguish Ref<T> get()'s from Optional get()'s and Supplier get()'s
* Implicit ofy().load() offers much less control
- Antipattern for ultimate goal of making Ofy injectable
- Can't control cache use or batch loading without making ofy() explicit anyway
* Serialization behavior is surprising and could be quite dangerous/incorrect
- Can lead to serialization errors. If it actually worked "as intended",
it would lead to a Ref<> on a serialized object being replaced upon
deserialization with a stale copy of the old value, which could potentially
break all kinds of transactional expectations
* Having both Ref<T> and Key<T> introduces extra boilerplate everywhere
- E.g. helper methods all need to have Ref and Key overloads, or you need to
call .key() to get the Key<T> for every Ref<T> you want to pass in
- Creating a Ref<T> is more cumbersome, since it doesn't have all the create()
overloads that Key<T> has, only create(Key<T>) and create(Entity) - no way to
create directly from kind+ID/name, raw Key, websafe key string, etc.
(Note that Refs are treated specially by Objectify's @Load method and Keys are not;
we don't use that feature, but it is the one advantage Refs have over Keys.)
The direct impetus for this change is that I am trying to audit our use of memcache,
and the implicit .get() calls to datastore were making that very hard.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=131965491
Old ForeignKeyIndex entities pointing to hosts are soft-deleted when a
host is renamed, and a new ForeignKeyIndex is created that correctly
points at the new host. This is an expected state of the system, so
don't throw an error when it is observed.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=122447608
ReferenceUnion is a hack to work around the mismatch between how
we store references (by roid) and how they are represented in EPP
(by foreign key). If it ever needed to exist (not entirely clear...)
it should have remained tightly scoped within the domain commands
and resources. Instead it has leaked everywhere in the project,
causing lots of boilerplate. This CL hides all of that behind
standard Refs, and should be followed by work to remove ReferenceUnion
completely.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=122424416
There are several situations in which it is a valid system state for
Keys to PollMessages on Domains to point to entities that don't exist,
chief amongst them when a domain has been soft-deleted. We also can't
simply null this out when soft-deleting domains, because there may be
an un-acked recurrence meaning it can't be deleted.
Given this, it doesn't make sense to check for entity existence here,
as it is not a system invariant and cannot easily be made to be so.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=122300368
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/monitoring/whitebox/VerifyEntityIntegrityAction.java (Browse further)
