After this CL, "support" accounts (accounts that are part of the "support" G-Suite group) will the same access to the registrar console as GCP "admins". However, they don't won't have access to the GCP project itself.
We could give them their own Role in the future (say SUPPORT) and give them different access than "admins", but right now we don't need it and YAGNI or something :)
NOTE: we identify users by their email (they need to be logged in to a google account). I don't know if that's best practice, since I guess different google accounts might have the same email address. However, G-Suite groups' membership is by email so there's not much we can do about it if we want to use G-Suite groups.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=220804273
This removes some qualifiers that aren't necessary (e.g. public/abstract on interfaces, private on enum constructors, final on private methods, static on nested interfaces/enums), uses Java 8 lambdas and features where that's an improvement
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=177182945
The dark lord Gosling designed the Java package naming system so that
ownership flows from the DNS system. Since we own the domain name
registry.google, it seems only appropriate that we should use
google.registry as our package name.
This change renames directories in preparation for the great package
rename. The repository is now in a broken state because the code
itself hasn't been updated. However this should ensure that git
correctly preserves history for each file.
2016-05-13 18:55:08 -04:00
Renamed from java/com/google/domain/registry/groups/GroupsConnection.java (Browse further)