This will make it much easier to detect issues with bad EPP XML (e.g. the one in the loadtest action fixed in [] based on the request logs, since otherwise the only indication of what went wrong is the EPP response returned to the client, which we don't store anywhere.
Now we'll get log messages that look like this:
google.registry.flows.EppController handleEppCommand: EPP request XML unmarshalling failed - "Syntax error at line 2, column 7: cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 'epp'.": (EppController.java:59)
{"clientId":"CharlestonRoad","resultCode":2001,"resultMessage":"Command syntax error","xmlBytes":"PD94bWwgdmVyc2lvbj0iMS4wIiBlbmNvZGluZz0iVVRGLTgiIHN0YW5kYWxvbmU9InllcyI\/Pgo8ZXBwLz4K"}
========================================
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes"?>
<epp/>
========================================
google.registry.flows.EppXmlTransformer$GenericSyntaxErrorException: Syntax error at line 2, column 7: cvc-elt.1: Cannot find the declaration of element 'epp'.
at google.registry.flows.EppXmlTransformer.unmarshal(EppXmlTransformer.java:89)
at google.registry.flows.EppController.handleEppCommand(EppController.java:56)
at google.registry.flows.EppRequestHandler.executeEpp(EppRequestHandler.java:37)
at google.registry.flows.EppToolAction.run(EppToolAction.java:33)
<snip>
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137363446
Right now, DomainApplicationCreateFlow checks to make sure that the registration period is in years, but doesn't store it in the DomainApplication explicitly. Instead, when DomainAllocateFlow runs later, it goes back to the XML in the HistoryEntry to get the number of years. Corey suggests that it would be cleaner to store the number of years in the DomainApplication. This is stage one of a data migration; we store the value, but don't actually read it anywhere except in tests. If we have any outstanding domain applications, we will then need to write a scrap tool to populate the years field, after which we can start relying on the field.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137317739
This was meant for log replay and has long been ignored/useless.
As part of this, remove execution time from EppResponse since this
was the only thing consuming it.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=137293734
We already had methods to return just the create or just the renew price. I added more to return just the premium flag or just the fee class.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136833071
The renew flow was still using PricingEngineProxy directly, meaning that it did not pick up on any TLD-specific pricing logic. Fixed this, and added tests to make sure.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136757922
There are no applications extant that predate the creationTrid field.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=136047561
This is to better distinguish between an LRP "token" (the string passed along in EPP) and the datastore entity that contains the token and all metadata.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135943480
It is no longer needed since we don't do log-replay and it's
annoying to support in the flat flows.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135805088
This CL implements the TLD-specific extra flow logic for updates, with tests, based on the static helper classes of the previous CL.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135683537
Very few flows actually check the phase. Push the checks down to the leaf
flows so that we can remove the inherited code from ResourceFlow and replace
it with utility methods. In the process, document and test two places that
throw the exception but did not previously test it.
This introduces a temporary hack in BaseDomainCreateFlow that does something
specific for DomainApplicationCreateFlow. It will go away literally tomorrow
when I flatten that flow.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=135480538
TESTED=I deployed it on alpha, renamed some hosts, and verified that
the [] ran as expected.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134991941
This will make potential issues a little nicer to debug in the future, because
the person hitting these endpoints manually will immediately know why they may
not be kicking off a [] console as might be expected.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134840223
This applies lessons learned from the async batch DNS refresh action, in
particular making testing more robust.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134833523
This CL fixes a bug introduced in [] which caused an exception to be thrown when an attempt was made to update a domain without a fee extension, even if the update was free, as it usually is. The fee extension should only be required if the update is not free.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134830250
This will replace the existing DnsRefreshForHostRenameAction.
This is stage one of a three stage migration process. It adds the new queue and
[] but doesn't call them yet. Stage two will cut over to using the new
functionality, and stage three will remove the old functionality.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134793963
This attempts to improve the organization of the helper methods in
DomainTransferRequestFlow created by the flattening in []
The primary changes are:
- new createTransferServerApproveEntities() method that now makes
all the server approve entities in one centralized place
- new createPendingTransferData() method that takes the server
approve entities and hides the slightly hacky code that parses out
the right ones to stuff into the TransferData
This seems like an overall simpler structure to me. With this change,
run() is 20 lines shorter and the flow overall is 40 lines shorter (not
counting a big blob of javadoc I added).
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134315295
These have already been totally replaced by flattened flows.
There are a few left that will get deleted when the remaining
flat flows go in.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134077510
The reason field is 1:1 mapped to skus in billing reports. Need to add a new reason for EAP for this type of billing event for reporting to work correctly. Also map that reason to the correct SKU.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=134005364
When custom effective date is passed in the check command, the response should
contain that date as an acknowledgemant that the check is performed at a time
different from now.
Also when the fee(s) returned contains a validDateRange (i. e. EAP fees that
are only valid during a certain period), the response will contain a notAfter
field which is the date after which the quoted fee(s) are no longer valid. (i.
e. the earliest of the end dates of all fees that would expire.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133989775
These were historically separate due to the old flow
structure, but now they should be one exception.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133984858
It is replaced by loadByForeignKey(), which does the same thing that
loadByUniqueId() did for contacts, hosts, and domains, and also
loadDomainApplication(), which loads domain application by ROID. This eliminates
the ugly mode-switching of attemping to load by other foreign key or ROID.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133980156
Also pull out a small bit of common functionality across contact and host checks.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133977324
It's best to be consistent and use the same thing everywhere. "clientId" was
already used in more places and is shorter and no more ambiguous, so it's the
logical one to win out.
Note that this CL is almost solely a big Eclipse-assisted refactoring. There are
two places that I did not change clientIdentifier -- the actual entity field on
Registrar (though I did change all getters and setters), and the name of a
column on the exported registrar spreadsheet. Both would require data
migrations.
Also fixes a few minor nits discovered in touched files, including an incorrect
test in OfyFilterTest.java and some superfluous uses of String.format() when
calling checkArgument().
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133956465
Also make minor javadoc tweaks to domain transfer flows
to match what we are changing in contact/host flows.
-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=133955677
