mirror of
https://github.com/google/nomulus.git
synced 2025-05-14 16:37:13 +02:00
Require that DNS writer be set on Registry entities
We ran into a bunch of prober deployment issues this past week when attempting to spin up a new cluster because the newly created prober TLDs had null values for the dnsWriter field. Given that VoidDnsWriter exists, we can require that dnsWriter always be set, and have people use that if DNS publishing is not required. Also cleans up a bunch of related inconsistent exception messages and tests not verifying said exception messages properly. ------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=154325830
This commit is contained in:
parent
d7da112c19
commit
d30f9411d8
11 changed files with 332 additions and 115 deletions
|
@ -59,6 +59,7 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
persistReservedList("xn--q9jyb4c_r1", "foo,FULLY_BLOCKED");
|
||||
persistReservedList("xn--q9jyb4c_r2", "moop,FULLY_BLOCKED");
|
||||
createTld("xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
command.dnsWriterNames = ImmutableSet.of("VoidDnsWriter", "FooDnsWriter");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -173,6 +174,13 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
assertThat(Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").getPendingDeleteLength()).isEqualTo(standardMinutes(5));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testSuccess_dnsWriter() throws Exception {
|
||||
assertThat(Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").getDnsWriter()).isEqualTo("VoidDnsWriter");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--dns_writer=FooDnsWriter", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
assertThat(Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").getDnsWriter()).isEqualTo("FooDnsWriter");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testSuccess_escrow() throws Exception {
|
||||
runCommandForced("--escrow=true", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -445,37 +453,42 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidAddGracePeriod() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--add_grace_period=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidRedemptionGracePeriod() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--redemption_grace_period=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidPendingDeleteLength() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--pending_delete_length=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidTldState() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
"INVALID_STATE not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--tld_state_transitions=" + START_OF_TIME + "=INVALID_STATE", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidTldStateTransitionTime() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
"INVALID_STATE not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--tld_state_transitions=tomorrow=INVALID_STATE", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_tldStatesOutOfOrder() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class, "The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=SUNRISE,%s=PREDELEGATION", now, now.plusMonths(1)),
|
||||
|
@ -484,7 +497,9 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateTldStateTransitions() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
"The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=SUNRISE,%s=SUNRISE", now, now.plusMonths(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -492,7 +507,8 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateTldStateTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, "not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE", now, now),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -500,7 +516,8 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_outOfOrderTldStateTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, "not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE", now, now.minus(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -567,15 +584,15 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidRenewBillingCost() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, "not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=US42", START_OF_TIME),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=US42", START_OF_TIME), "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_negativeRenewBillingCost() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Renew billing cost cannot be negative");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=USD-42", START_OF_TIME),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -583,13 +600,15 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidRenewCostTransitionTime() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, "not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=tomorrow=USD 1", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateRenewCostTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, "not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=\"%s=USD 1,%s=USD 2\"", now, now),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -597,7 +616,8 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_outOfOrderRenewCostTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, "not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=\"%s=USD 1,%s=USD 2\"", now, now.minus(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
|
@ -605,28 +625,35 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_noTldName() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class, "Main parameters are required (\"Names of the TLDs\")");
|
||||
runCommandForced();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_oneArgumentDoesNotExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
public void testFailure_oneTldDoesNotExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "TLD foo does not exist");
|
||||
runCommandForced("foo", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateArguments() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "Duplicate arguments found: 'xn--q9jyb4c'");
|
||||
runCommandForced("xn--q9jyb4c", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_tldDoesNotExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class, "TLD foobarbaz does not exist");
|
||||
runCommandForced("foobarbaz");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_specifiedDnsWriter_doesntExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class, "The DNS writer 'InvalidDnsWriter' doesn't exist");
|
||||
runCommandForced("xn--q9jyb4c", "--dns_writer=InvalidDnsWriter");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_setNonExistentReservedLists() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue