mirror of
https://github.com/google/nomulus.git
synced 2025-07-22 02:36:03 +02:00
Use smaller shard size in ClaimsListShardTest
The default production value of 10,000 was unnecessarily large for testing purposes. ------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=132441792
This commit is contained in:
parent
4652688585
commit
cadf9d4af2
9 changed files with 17 additions and 5 deletions
|
@ -1,90 +0,0 @@
|
|||
# Registry tool
|
||||
|
||||
The registry tool is a command-line registry administration tool that is invoked
|
||||
using the `registry_tool` command. It has the ability to view and change a
|
||||
large number of things in a running domain registry environment, including
|
||||
creating registrars, updating premium and reserved lists, running an EPP command
|
||||
from a given XML file, and performing various backend tasks like re-running RDE
|
||||
if the most recent export failed. Its code lives inside the tools package
|
||||
(`java/google/registry/tools`), and is compiled by building the `registry_tool`
|
||||
target in the Bazel BUILD file in that package.
|
||||
|
||||
To build the tool and display its command-line help, execute this command:
|
||||
|
||||
$ bazel run //java/google/registry/tool:registry_tool -- --help
|
||||
|
||||
For future invocations you should alias the compiled binary in the
|
||||
`bazel-genfiles/java/google/registry` directory or add it to your path so that
|
||||
you can run it more easily. The rest of this guide assumes that it has been
|
||||
aliased to `registry_tool`.
|
||||
|
||||
The registry tool is always called with a specific environment to run in using
|
||||
the -e parameter. This looks like:
|
||||
|
||||
$ registry_tool -e production {command name} {command parameters}
|
||||
|
||||
To see a list of all available commands along with usage information, run
|
||||
registry_tool without specifying a command name, e.g.:
|
||||
|
||||
$ registry_tool -e alpha
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the documentation for the commands comes from JCommander, which parses
|
||||
metadata contained within the code to yield documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
## Tech support commands
|
||||
|
||||
There are actually two separate tools, `gtech_tool`, which is a collection of
|
||||
lower impact commands intended to be used by tech support personnel, and
|
||||
`registry_tool`, which is a superset of `gtech_tool` that contains additional
|
||||
commands that are potentially more destructive and can change more aspects of
|
||||
the system. A full list of `gtech_tool` commands can be found in
|
||||
`GtechTool.java`, and the additional commands that only `registry_tool` has
|
||||
access to are in `RegistryTool.java`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Local and server-side commands
|
||||
|
||||
There are two broad ways that commands are implemented: some that send requests
|
||||
to `ToolsServlet` to execute the action on the server (these commands implement
|
||||
`ServerSideCommand`), and others that execute the command locally using the
|
||||
[Remote API](https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/java/tools/remoteapi)
|
||||
(these commands implement `RemoteApiCommand`). Server-side commands take more
|
||||
work to implement because they require both a client and a server-side
|
||||
component, e.g. `CreatePremiumListCommand.java` and
|
||||
`CreatePremiumListAction.java` respectively for creating a premium list.
|
||||
However, they are fully capable of doing anything that is possible with App
|
||||
Engine, including running a large MapReduce, because they execute on the tools
|
||||
service in the App Engine cloud.
|
||||
|
||||
Local commands, by contrast, are easier to implement, because there is only a
|
||||
local component to write, but they aren't as powerful. A general rule of thumb
|
||||
for making this determination is to use a local command if possible, or a
|
||||
server-side command otherwise.
|
||||
|
||||
## Common tool patterns
|
||||
|
||||
All tools ultimately implement the `Command` interface located in the `tools`
|
||||
package. If you use an IDE such as Eclipse to view the type hierarchy of that
|
||||
interface, you'll see all of the commands that exist, as well as how a lot of
|
||||
them are grouped using sub-interfaces or abstract classes that provide
|
||||
additional functionality. The most common patterns that are used by a large
|
||||
number of other tools are:
|
||||
|
||||
* **`BigqueryCommand`** -- Provides a connection to BigQuery for tools that need
|
||||
it.
|
||||
* **`ConfirmingCommand`** -- Provides the methods `prompt()` and `execute()` to
|
||||
override. `prompt()` outputs a message (usually what the command is going to
|
||||
do) and prompts the user to confirm execution of the command, and then
|
||||
`execute()` actually does it.
|
||||
* **`EppToolCommand`** -- Commands that work by executing EPP commands against
|
||||
the server, usually by filling in a template with parameters that were passed
|
||||
on the command-line.
|
||||
* **`MutatingEppToolCommand`** -- A sub-class of `EppToolCommand` that provides
|
||||
a `--dry_run` flag, that, if passed, will display the output from the server
|
||||
of what the command would've done without actually committing those changes.
|
||||
* **`GetEppResourceCommand`** -- Gets individual EPP resources from the server
|
||||
and outputs them.
|
||||
* **`ListObjectsCommand`** -- Lists all objects of a specific type from the
|
||||
server and outputs them.
|
||||
* **`MutatingCommand`** -- Provides a facility to create or update entities in
|
||||
Datastore, and uses a diff algorithm to display the changes that will be made
|
||||
before committing them.
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue