Make FlowRunner log ICANN activity report field name

As part of b/36599833, this makes FlowRunner log the appropriate ICANN activity
report field name for each flow it runs as part of a structured JSON log
statement which can be parsed to generate ICANN activity reports (under the key
"icannActivityReportField").

In order to support this, we introduce an annotation for Flow classes called
@ReportingSpec and a corresponding enum of values for this annotation, which is
IcannReportingTypes.ActivityReportField, that stores the mapping of constant
enum values to field names.

The mapping from flows to fields is fairly obvious, with three exceptions:

 - Application flows are all accounted under domains, since applications are
   technically just deferred domain creates within the EPP protocol
 - ClaimsCheckFlow is counted as a domain check
 - DomainAllocateFlow is counted as a domain create

In addition, I've added tests to all the corresponding flows that we are
indeed logging what we expect.

We'll also need to log the TLD for this to be useful, but I'm doing that in a
follow-up CL.

-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=151283411
This commit is contained in:
nickfelt 2017-03-26 21:18:15 -07:00 committed by Ben McIlwain
parent b03bd3b525
commit 91c2558feb
72 changed files with 520 additions and 24 deletions

View file

@ -15,16 +15,16 @@
package google.registry.testing;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertAbout;
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
import com.google.common.testing.TestLogHandler;
import com.google.common.truth.AbstractVerb.DelegatedVerb;
import com.google.common.truth.Correspondence;
import com.google.common.truth.FailureStrategy;
import com.google.common.truth.StringSubject;
import com.google.common.truth.Subject;
import google.registry.testing.TruthChainer.And;
import google.registry.testing.TruthChainer.Which;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.logging.Handler;
import java.util.logging.Level;
@ -64,21 +64,27 @@ public class LogsSubject extends Subject<LogsSubject, TestLogHandler> {
return builder.build();
}
public And<LogsSubject> hasNoLogsAtLevel(Level level) {
public void hasNoLogsAtLevel(Level level) {
check()
.withFailureMessage("Logs at level %s", level)
.that(getMessagesAtLevel(level))
.isEmpty();
return new And<>(this);
}
public And<LogsSubject> hasLogAtLevelWithMessage(Level level, String message) {
public Which<StringSubject> hasLogAtLevelWithMessage(Level level, String message) {
List<String> messagesAtLevel = getMessagesAtLevel(level);
check()
.withFailureMessage("Logs at level %s", level)
.that(getMessagesAtLevel(level))
.that(messagesAtLevel)
.comparingElementsUsing(CONTAINS_CORRESPONDENCE)
.contains(message);
return new And<>(this);
for (String messageCandidate : messagesAtLevel) {
if (messageCandidate.contains(message)) {
return new Which<>(assertThat(messageCandidate)
.named(String.format("log message at %s matching '%s'", level, message)));
}
}
throw new AssertionError("Message check passed yet matching message not found");
}
public static DelegatedVerb<LogsSubject, TestLogHandler> assertAboutLogs() {