mirror of
https://github.com/google/nomulus.git
synced 2025-05-14 16:37:13 +02:00
Automatically refactor more exception testing to use new JUnit rules
------------- Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=179072309
This commit is contained in:
parent
d5d29959b4
commit
9157930983
100 changed files with 3900 additions and 3192 deletions
|
@ -465,88 +465,128 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidAddGracePeriod() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--add_grace_period=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--add_grace_period=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidRedemptionGracePeriod() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--redemption_grace_period=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--redemption_grace_period=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidPendingDeleteLength() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--pending_delete_length=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--pending_delete_length=5m", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("Invalid format: \"5m\"");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidTldState() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage(
|
||||
"INVALID_STATE not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--tld_state_transitions=" + START_OF_TIME + "=INVALID_STATE", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=" + START_OF_TIME + "=INVALID_STATE", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("INVALID_STATE not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidTldStateTransitionTime() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage(
|
||||
"INVALID_STATE not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--tld_state_transitions=tomorrow=INVALID_STATE", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced("--tld_state_transitions=tomorrow=INVALID_STATE", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("INVALID_STATE not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_tldStatesOutOfOrder() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=SUNRISE,%s=PREDELEGATION", now, now.plusMonths(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=SUNRISE,%s=PREDELEGATION",
|
||||
now, now.plusMonths(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateTldStateTransitions() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=SUNRISE,%s=SUNRISE", now, now.plusMonths(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=SUNRISE,%s=SUNRISE", now, now.plusMonths(1)),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateTldStateTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE", now, now),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE", now, now),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_outOfOrderTldStateTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE",
|
||||
now, now.minus(Duration.millis(1))),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE",
|
||||
now, now.minus(Duration.millis(1))),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_bothTldStateFlags() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Don't pass both --set_current_tld_state and --tld_state_transitions");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE", now, now.plusDays(1)),
|
||||
"--set_current_tld_state=GENERAL_AVAILABILITY",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--tld_state_transitions=%s=PREDELEGATION,%s=SUNRISE",
|
||||
now, now.plusDays(1)),
|
||||
"--set_current_tld_state=GENERAL_AVAILABILITY",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("Don't pass both --set_current_tld_state and --tld_state_transitions");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -558,9 +598,11 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
START_OF_TIME, TldState.PREDELEGATION,
|
||||
now.minusMonths(1), TldState.GENERAL_AVAILABILITY))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--set_current_tld_state=SUNRISE", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--set_current_tld_state=SUNRISE", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("The TLD states are chronologically out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -572,9 +614,13 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
START_OF_TIME, TldState.PREDELEGATION,
|
||||
now.plusMonths(1), TldState.GENERAL_AVAILABILITY))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage(" when there is a later transition already scheduled");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--set_current_tld_state=SUNRISE", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--set_current_tld_state=SUNRISE", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(" when there is a later transition already scheduled");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -586,99 +632,139 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
START_OF_TIME, TldState.PREDELEGATION,
|
||||
now.minusMonths(1), TldState.GENERAL_AVAILABILITY))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("--set_current_tld_state is not safe to use in production.");
|
||||
runCommandInEnvironment(
|
||||
RegistryToolEnvironment.PRODUCTION,
|
||||
"--set_current_tld_state=SUNRISE",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c",
|
||||
"--force");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandInEnvironment(
|
||||
RegistryToolEnvironment.PRODUCTION,
|
||||
"--set_current_tld_state=SUNRISE",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c",
|
||||
"--force"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("--set_current_tld_state is not safe to use in production.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidRenewBillingCost() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=US42", START_OF_TIME), "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=US42", START_OF_TIME),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_negativeRenewBillingCost() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Renew billing cost cannot be negative");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=USD-42", START_OF_TIME),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=%s=USD-42", START_OF_TIME),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("Renew billing cost cannot be negative");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_invalidRenewCostTransitionTime() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=tomorrow=USD 1", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=tomorrow=USD 1", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateRenewCostTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format("--renew_billing_cost_transitions=\"%s=USD 1,%s=USD 2\"", now, now),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--renew_billing_cost_transitions=\"%s=USD 1,%s=USD 2\"", now, now),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_outOfOrderRenewCostTransitionTimes() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--renew_billing_cost_transitions=\"%s=USD 1,%s=USD 2\"",
|
||||
now, now.minus(Duration.millis(1))),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
String.format(
|
||||
"--renew_billing_cost_transitions=\"%s=USD 1,%s=USD 2\"",
|
||||
now, now.minus(Duration.millis(1))),
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("not formatted correctly or has transition times out of order");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_noTldName() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Main parameters are required (\"Names of the TLDs\")");
|
||||
runCommandForced();
|
||||
ParameterException thrown = expectThrows(ParameterException.class, () -> runCommandForced());
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("Main parameters are required (\"Names of the TLDs\")");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_oneTldDoesNotExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("TLD foo does not exist");
|
||||
runCommandForced("foo", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> runCommandForced("foo", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("TLD foo does not exist");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_duplicateArguments() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Duplicate arguments found: 'xn--q9jyb4c'");
|
||||
runCommandForced("xn--q9jyb4c", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> runCommandForced("xn--q9jyb4c", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("Duplicate arguments found: 'xn--q9jyb4c'");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_tldDoesNotExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("TLD foobarbaz does not exist");
|
||||
runCommandForced("foobarbaz");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> runCommandForced("foobarbaz"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("TLD foobarbaz does not exist");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_specifiedDnsWriter_doesntExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Invalid DNS writer name(s) specified: [InvalidDnsWriter]");
|
||||
runCommandForced("xn--q9jyb4c", "--dns_writers=InvalidDnsWriter");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("xn--q9jyb4c", "--dns_writers=InvalidDnsWriter"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("Invalid DNS writer name(s) specified: [InvalidDnsWriter]");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_setNonExistentReservedLists() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("Could not find reserved list xn--q9jyb4c_ZZZ to add to the tld");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--reserved_lists", "xn--q9jyb4c_ZZZ", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--reserved_lists", "xn--q9jyb4c_ZZZ", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains("Could not find reserved list xn--q9jyb4c_ZZZ to add to the tld");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -686,9 +772,11 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
persistResource(Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").asBuilder()
|
||||
.setReservedListsByName(ImmutableSet.of("xn--q9jyb4c_r1", "xn--q9jyb4c_r2"))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("xn--q9jyb4c_r1");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--add_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_r1", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--add_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_r1", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("xn--q9jyb4c_r1");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -696,19 +784,24 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
persistResource(Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").asBuilder()
|
||||
.setReservedListsByName(ImmutableSet.of("xn--q9jyb4c_r1", "xn--q9jyb4c_r2"))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("xn--q9jyb4c_Z");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--remove_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_Z", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--remove_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_Z", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("xn--q9jyb4c_Z");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_cantAddAndRemoveSameReservedListSimultaneously() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("xn--q9jyb4c_r1");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--add_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_r1",
|
||||
"--remove_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_r1",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--add_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_r1",
|
||||
"--remove_reserved_lists=xn--q9jyb4c_r1",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("xn--q9jyb4c_r1");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -717,9 +810,11 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").asBuilder()
|
||||
.setAllowedRegistrantContactIds(ImmutableSet.of("alice", "bob"))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("alice");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--add_allowed_registrants=alice", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--add_allowed_registrants=alice", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("alice");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -728,19 +823,24 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
Registry.get("xn--q9jyb4c").asBuilder()
|
||||
.setAllowedRegistrantContactIds(ImmutableSet.of("alice"))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("bob");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--remove_allowed_registrants=bob", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--remove_allowed_registrants=bob", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("bob");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_cantAddAndRemoveSameAllowedRegistrantsSimultaneously() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("alice");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--add_allowed_registrants=alice",
|
||||
"--remove_allowed_registrants=alice",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--add_allowed_registrants=alice",
|
||||
"--remove_allowed_registrants=alice",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("alice");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -750,9 +850,11 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
.setAllowedFullyQualifiedHostNames(
|
||||
ImmutableSet.of("ns1.example.com", "ns2.example.com"))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("ns1.example.com");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--add_allowed_nameservers=ns1.example.com", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--add_allowed_nameservers=ns1.example.com", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("ns1.example.com");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -762,19 +864,24 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
.setAllowedFullyQualifiedHostNames(
|
||||
ImmutableSet.of("ns1.example.com"))
|
||||
.build());
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("ns2.example.com");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--remove_allowed_nameservers=ns2.example.com", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--remove_allowed_nameservers=ns2.example.com", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("ns2.example.com");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_cantAddAndRemoveSameAllowedNameserversSimultaneously() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("ns1.example.com");
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--add_allowed_nameservers=ns1.example.com",
|
||||
"--remove_allowed_nameservers=ns1.example.com",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--add_allowed_nameservers=ns1.example.com",
|
||||
"--remove_allowed_nameservers=ns1.example.com",
|
||||
"xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("ns1.example.com");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -895,9 +1002,11 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_setPremiumListThatDoesntExist() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(IllegalArgumentException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("The premium list 'phonies' doesn't exist");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--premium_list=phonies", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
IllegalArgumentException.class,
|
||||
() -> runCommandForced("--premium_list=phonies", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("The premium list 'phonies' doesn't exist");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
|
@ -910,17 +1019,24 @@ public class UpdateTldCommandTest extends CommandTestCase<UpdateTldCommand> {
|
|||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_updateLrpPeriod_backwardsInterval() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage(
|
||||
"--lrp_period=2005-06-09T12:30:00Z/2004-07-10T13:30:00Z not an ISO-8601 interval");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--lrp_period=2005-06-09T12:30:00Z/2004-07-10T13:30:00Z", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
runCommandForced(
|
||||
"--lrp_period=2005-06-09T12:30:00Z/2004-07-10T13:30:00Z", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"--lrp_period=2005-06-09T12:30:00Z/2004-07-10T13:30:00Z not an ISO-8601 interval");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
public void testFailure_updateLrpPeriod_badInterval() throws Exception {
|
||||
thrown.expect(ParameterException.class);
|
||||
thrown.expectMessage("--lrp_period=foobar not an ISO-8601 interval");
|
||||
runCommandForced("--lrp_period=foobar", "xn--q9jyb4c");
|
||||
ParameterException thrown =
|
||||
expectThrows(
|
||||
ParameterException.class, () -> runCommandForced("--lrp_period=foobar", "xn--q9jyb4c"));
|
||||
assertThat(thrown).hasMessageThat().contains("--lrp_period=foobar not an ISO-8601 interval");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void runSuccessfulReservedListsTest(String reservedLists) throws Exception {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue