Reverse dependency between /flows/ and /batch/

Certain flows need to launch batched jobs. Logically this would mean that flows
depend on batch.

However, the current state of dependency was the other way around, and the
reason for that was ResourceFlowUtils.java that had in it some utility
functions that weren't used in the flows and were needed in the batch jobs.

This CL removes these utility functions from the /flows/ directory, letting us
reverse the dependency edge between flows/ and batch/

Part of this was moving the flows/async/ code into batch/ - which also makes sense because flows/async/ just "enqueued" tasks that would then be run by actions in batch/

It makes sense that the code that enqueues the tasks and the code that dequeues the tasks sit in the same library.

-------------
Created by MOE: https://github.com/google/moe
MOE_MIGRATED_REVID=228698761
This commit is contained in:
guyben 2019-01-10 06:19:17 -08:00 committed by Ben McIlwain
parent d0c73efac0
commit 898448b8a0
42 changed files with 419 additions and 423 deletions

View file

@ -21,18 +21,18 @@ import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkState;
import static com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList.toImmutableList;
import static com.google.common.math.IntMath.divide;
import static com.googlecode.objectify.Key.getKind;
import static google.registry.flows.ResourceFlowUtils.denyPendingTransfer;
import static google.registry.flows.ResourceFlowUtils.handlePendingTransferOnDelete;
import static google.registry.flows.ResourceFlowUtils.updateForeignKeyIndexDeletionTime;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.PARAM_CLIENT_TRANSACTION_ID;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.PARAM_IS_SUPERUSER;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.PARAM_REQUESTED_TIME;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.PARAM_REQUESTING_CLIENT_ID;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.PARAM_RESOURCE_KEY;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.PARAM_SERVER_TRANSACTION_ID;
import static google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowEnqueuer.QUEUE_ASYNC_DELETE;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.PARAM_CLIENT_TRANSACTION_ID;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.PARAM_IS_SUPERUSER;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.PARAM_REQUESTED_TIME;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.PARAM_REQUESTING_CLIENT_ID;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.PARAM_RESOURCE_KEY;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.PARAM_SERVER_TRANSACTION_ID;
import static google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskEnqueuer.QUEUE_ASYNC_DELETE;
import static google.registry.model.EppResourceUtils.isActive;
import static google.registry.model.EppResourceUtils.isDeleted;
import static google.registry.model.ResourceTransferUtils.denyPendingTransfer;
import static google.registry.model.ResourceTransferUtils.handlePendingTransferOnDelete;
import static google.registry.model.ResourceTransferUtils.updateForeignKeyIndexDeletionTime;
import static google.registry.model.eppcommon.StatusValue.PENDING_DELETE;
import static google.registry.model.ofy.ObjectifyService.ofy;
import static google.registry.model.reporting.HistoryEntry.Type.CONTACT_DELETE;
@ -63,11 +63,10 @@ import com.google.common.collect.Iterators;
import com.google.common.collect.Multiset;
import com.google.common.flogger.FluentLogger;
import com.googlecode.objectify.Key;
import google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskMetrics.OperationResult;
import google.registry.batch.AsyncTaskMetrics.OperationType;
import google.registry.batch.DeleteContactsAndHostsAction.DeletionResult.Type;
import google.registry.dns.DnsQueue;
import google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowMetrics;
import google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowMetrics.OperationResult;
import google.registry.flows.async.AsyncFlowMetrics.OperationType;
import google.registry.mapreduce.MapreduceRunner;
import google.registry.mapreduce.UnlockerOutput;
import google.registry.mapreduce.inputs.EppResourceInputs;
@ -124,7 +123,7 @@ public class DeleteContactsAndHostsAction implements Runnable {
private static final int MAX_REDUCE_SHARDS = 50;
private static final int DELETES_PER_SHARD = 5;
@Inject AsyncFlowMetrics asyncFlowMetrics;
@Inject AsyncTaskMetrics asyncTaskMetrics;
@Inject Clock clock;
@Inject MapreduceRunner mrRunner;
@Inject @Named(QUEUE_ASYNC_DELETE) Queue queue;
@ -154,7 +153,7 @@ public class DeleteContactsAndHostsAction implements Runnable {
LeaseOptions.Builder.withCountLimit(maxLeaseCount())
.leasePeriod(LEASE_LENGTH.getStandardSeconds(), SECONDS);
List<TaskHandle> tasks = queue.leaseTasks(options);
asyncFlowMetrics.recordContactHostDeletionBatchSize(tasks.size());
asyncTaskMetrics.recordContactHostDeletionBatchSize(tasks.size());
// Check if there are no tasks to process, and if so, return early.
if (tasks.isEmpty()) {
@ -210,7 +209,7 @@ public class DeleteContactsAndHostsAction implements Runnable {
retrier.callWithRetry(() -> queue.deleteTask(tasks), TransientFailureException.class);
deletionRequests.forEach(
deletionRequest ->
asyncFlowMetrics.recordAsyncFlowResult(
asyncTaskMetrics.recordAsyncFlowResult(
deletionRequest.getMetricOperationType(),
OperationResult.STALE,
deletionRequest.requestedTime()));
@ -306,7 +305,7 @@ public class DeleteContactsAndHostsAction implements Runnable {
private static final DnsQueue dnsQueue = DnsQueue.create();
@NonFinalForTesting
private static AsyncFlowMetrics asyncFlowMetrics = new AsyncFlowMetrics(new SystemClock());
private static AsyncTaskMetrics asyncTaskMetrics = new AsyncTaskMetrics(new SystemClock());
@Override
public void reduce(final DeletionRequest deletionRequest, ReducerInput<Boolean> values) {
@ -321,7 +320,7 @@ public class DeleteContactsAndHostsAction implements Runnable {
getQueue(QUEUE_ASYNC_DELETE).deleteTask(deletionRequest.task());
return deletionResult;
});
asyncFlowMetrics.recordAsyncFlowResult(
asyncTaskMetrics.recordAsyncFlowResult(
deletionRequest.getMetricOperationType(),
result.getMetricOperationResult(),
deletionRequest.requestedTime());