mirror of
https://github.com/google/nomulus.git
synced 2025-04-30 12:07:51 +02:00
Remove the mechanism to compare objects across database (#1822)
The migration is done. <!-- Reviewable:start --> - - - This change is [<img src="https://reviewable.io/review_button.svg" height="34" align="absmiddle" alt="Reviewable"/>](https://reviewable.io/reviews/google/nomulus/1822) <!-- Reviewable:end -->
This commit is contained in:
parent
d13e5595e2
commit
06ea83b428
6 changed files with 13 additions and 682 deletions
|
@ -14,17 +14,13 @@
|
|||
|
||||
package google.registry.model;
|
||||
|
||||
import static com.google.common.collect.Iterables.transform;
|
||||
import static com.google.common.collect.Maps.transformValues;
|
||||
import static google.registry.model.ofy.ObjectifyService.auditedOfy;
|
||||
import static google.registry.persistence.transaction.TransactionManagerFactory.tm;
|
||||
import static java.lang.annotation.ElementType.FIELD;
|
||||
import static java.lang.annotation.RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME;
|
||||
import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toCollection;
|
||||
import static java.util.stream.Collectors.toList;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Joiner;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.Maps;
|
||||
import com.googlecode.objectify.Key;
|
||||
import com.googlecode.objectify.annotation.Ignore;
|
||||
import google.registry.persistence.VKey;
|
||||
|
@ -56,15 +52,6 @@ public abstract class ImmutableObject implements Cloneable {
|
|||
@Target(FIELD)
|
||||
public @interface DoNotHydrate {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Indicates that the field should be ignored when comparing an object in the datastore to the
|
||||
* corresponding object in Cloud SQL.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@Documented
|
||||
@Retention(RUNTIME)
|
||||
@Target(FIELD)
|
||||
public @interface DoNotCompare {}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Indicates that the field stores a null value to indicate an empty set. This is also used in
|
||||
* object comparison.
|
||||
|
@ -105,7 +92,7 @@ public abstract class ImmutableObject implements Cloneable {
|
|||
*/
|
||||
protected Map<Field, Object> getSignificantFields() {
|
||||
// Can't use streams or ImmutableMap because we can have null values.
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> result = new LinkedHashMap();
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> result = new LinkedHashMap<>();
|
||||
for (Map.Entry<Field, Object> entry : ModelUtils.getFieldValues(this).entrySet()) {
|
||||
if (!entry.getKey().isAnnotationPresent(Insignificant.class)) {
|
||||
result.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
|
||||
|
@ -190,15 +177,15 @@ public abstract class ImmutableObject implements Cloneable {
|
|||
/** Helper function to recursively hydrate an ImmutableObject. */
|
||||
private static Object hydrate(Object value) {
|
||||
if (value instanceof Key) {
|
||||
if (tm().isOfy()) {
|
||||
return hydrate(auditedOfy().load().key((Key<?>) value).now());
|
||||
}
|
||||
return value;
|
||||
} else if (value instanceof Map) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (value instanceof Map) {
|
||||
return transformValues((Map<?, ?>) value, ImmutableObject::hydrate);
|
||||
} else if (value instanceof Collection) {
|
||||
return transform((Collection<?>) value, ImmutableObject::hydrate);
|
||||
} else if (value instanceof ImmutableObject) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (value instanceof Collection) {
|
||||
return ((Collection<?>) value).stream().map(ImmutableObject::hydrate);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (value instanceof ImmutableObject) {
|
||||
return ((ImmutableObject) value).toHydratedString();
|
||||
}
|
||||
return value;
|
||||
|
@ -220,7 +207,7 @@ public abstract class ImmutableObject implements Cloneable {
|
|||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
} else if (o instanceof Map) {
|
||||
return Maps.transformValues((Map<?, ?>) o, ImmutableObject::toMapRecursive);
|
||||
return transformValues((Map<?, ?>) o, ImmutableObject::toMapRecursive);
|
||||
} else if (o instanceof Set) {
|
||||
return ((Set<?>) o)
|
||||
.stream()
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ public class ContactHistory extends HistoryEntry implements UnsafeSerializable {
|
|||
|
||||
// Store ContactBase instead of Contact so we don't pick up its @Id
|
||||
// Nullable for the sake of pre-Registry-3.0 history objects
|
||||
@DoNotCompare @Nullable ContactBase contactBase;
|
||||
@Nullable ContactBase contactBase;
|
||||
|
||||
@Id
|
||||
@Access(AccessType.PROPERTY)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ public class DomainHistory extends HistoryEntry {
|
|||
|
||||
// Store DomainBase instead of Domain so we don't pick up its @Id
|
||||
// Nullable for the sake of pre-Registry-3.0 history objects
|
||||
@DoNotCompare @Nullable DomainBase domainBase;
|
||||
@Nullable DomainBase domainBase;
|
||||
|
||||
@Id
|
||||
@Access(AccessType.PROPERTY)
|
||||
|
@ -102,7 +102,6 @@ public class DomainHistory extends HistoryEntry {
|
|||
// We could have reused domainBase.nsHosts here, but Hibernate throws a weird exception after
|
||||
// we change to use a composite primary key.
|
||||
// TODO(b/166776754): Investigate if we can reuse domainBase.nsHosts for storing host keys.
|
||||
@DoNotCompare
|
||||
@ElementCollection
|
||||
@JoinTable(
|
||||
name = "DomainHistoryHost",
|
||||
|
@ -116,7 +115,6 @@ public class DomainHistory extends HistoryEntry {
|
|||
@Column(name = "host_repo_id")
|
||||
Set<VKey<Host>> nsHosts;
|
||||
|
||||
@DoNotCompare
|
||||
@OneToMany(
|
||||
cascade = {CascadeType.ALL},
|
||||
fetch = FetchType.EAGER,
|
||||
|
@ -137,7 +135,6 @@ public class DomainHistory extends HistoryEntry {
|
|||
@Ignore
|
||||
Set<DomainDsDataHistory> dsDataHistories = new HashSet<>();
|
||||
|
||||
@DoNotCompare
|
||||
@OneToMany(
|
||||
cascade = {CascadeType.ALL},
|
||||
fetch = FetchType.EAGER,
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -61,7 +61,7 @@ public class HostHistory extends HistoryEntry implements UnsafeSerializable {
|
|||
|
||||
// Store HostBase instead of Host so we don't pick up its @Id
|
||||
// Nullable for the sake of pre-Registry-3.0 history objects
|
||||
@DoNotCompare @Nullable HostBase hostBase;
|
||||
@Nullable HostBase hostBase;
|
||||
|
||||
@Id
|
||||
@Access(AccessType.PROPERTY)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -18,26 +18,19 @@ import static com.google.common.base.Preconditions.checkNotNull;
|
|||
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertAbout;
|
||||
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.common.annotations.VisibleForTesting;
|
||||
import com.google.common.base.Joiner;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.Iterables;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.Sets;
|
||||
import com.google.common.truth.Correspondence;
|
||||
import com.google.common.truth.Correspondence.BinaryPredicate;
|
||||
import com.google.common.truth.FailureMetadata;
|
||||
import com.google.common.truth.SimpleSubjectBuilder;
|
||||
import com.google.common.truth.Subject;
|
||||
import java.lang.annotation.Annotation;
|
||||
import java.lang.reflect.Field;
|
||||
import java.util.Arrays;
|
||||
import java.util.Collection;
|
||||
import java.util.Iterator;
|
||||
import java.util.LinkedHashMap;
|
||||
import java.util.Map;
|
||||
import java.util.Objects;
|
||||
import java.util.Set;
|
||||
import java.util.stream.Collector;
|
||||
import javax.annotation.Nullable;
|
||||
|
||||
/** Truth subject for asserting things about ImmutableObjects that are not built in. */
|
||||
|
@ -45,7 +38,7 @@ public final class ImmutableObjectSubject extends Subject {
|
|||
|
||||
@Nullable private final ImmutableObject actual;
|
||||
|
||||
protected ImmutableObjectSubject(
|
||||
private ImmutableObjectSubject(
|
||||
FailureMetadata failureMetadata, @Nullable ImmutableObject actual) {
|
||||
super(failureMetadata, actual);
|
||||
this.actual = actual;
|
||||
|
@ -73,261 +66,6 @@ public final class ImmutableObjectSubject extends Subject {
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Checks that {@code expected} has the same contents as {@code actual} except for fields that are
|
||||
* marked with {@link ImmutableObject.DoNotCompare}.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* <p>This is used to verify that entities stored in both cloud SQL and Datastore are identical.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public void isEqualAcrossDatabases(@Nullable ImmutableObject expected) {
|
||||
ComparisonResult result =
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
actual, expected, actual != null ? actual.getClass().getName() : "null");
|
||||
if (result.isFailure()) {
|
||||
throw new AssertionError(result.getMessage());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// The following "check" methods implement a recursive check of immutable object equality across
|
||||
// databases. All of them function in both assertive and predicate modes: if "path" is
|
||||
// provided (not null) then they throw AssertionError's with detailed error messages. If
|
||||
// it is null, they return true for equal objects and false for inequal ones.
|
||||
//
|
||||
// The reason for this dual-mode behavior is that all of these methods can either be used in the
|
||||
// context of a test assertion (in which case we want a detailed error message describing exactly
|
||||
// the location in a complex object where a difference was discovered) or in the context of a
|
||||
// membership check in a set (in which case we don't care about the specific location of the first
|
||||
// difference, we just want to be able to determine if the object "is equal to" another object as
|
||||
// efficiently as possible -- see checkSetAcrossDatabase()).
|
||||
|
||||
@VisibleForTesting
|
||||
static ComparisonResult checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
@Nullable Object actual, @Nullable Object expected, @Nullable String path) {
|
||||
if (Objects.equals(actual, expected)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// They're different, do a more detailed comparison.
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for null first (we can assume both variables are not null at this point).
|
||||
if (actual == null) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, "expected ", expected, "got null.");
|
||||
} else if (expected == null) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, "expected null, got ", actual);
|
||||
|
||||
// For immutable objects, we have to recurse since the contained
|
||||
// object could have DoNotCompare fields, too.
|
||||
} else if (expected instanceof ImmutableObject) {
|
||||
// We only verify that actual is an ImmutableObject so we get a good error message instead
|
||||
// of a context-less ClassCastException.
|
||||
if (!(actual instanceof ImmutableObject)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, actual, " is not an immutable object.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return checkImmutableAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
(ImmutableObject) actual, (ImmutableObject) expected, path);
|
||||
} else if (expected instanceof Map) {
|
||||
if (!(actual instanceof Map)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, actual, " is not a Map.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// This would likely be more efficient if we could assume that keys can be compared across
|
||||
// databases using .equals(), however we cannot guarantee key equality so the simplest and
|
||||
// most correct way to accomplish this is by reusing the set comparison.
|
||||
return checkSetAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
((Map<?, ?>) actual).entrySet(), ((Map<?, ?>) expected).entrySet(), path, "Map");
|
||||
} else if (expected instanceof Set) {
|
||||
if (!(actual instanceof Set)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, actual, " is not a Set.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return checkSetAcrossDatabases((Set<?>) actual, (Set<?>) expected, path, "Set");
|
||||
} else if (expected instanceof Collection) {
|
||||
if (!(actual instanceof Collection)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, actual, " is not a Collection.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return checkListAcrossDatabases((Collection<?>) actual, (Collection<?>) expected, path);
|
||||
// Give Map.Entry special treatment to facilitate the use of Set comparison for verification
|
||||
// of Map.
|
||||
} else if (expected instanceof Map.Entry) {
|
||||
if (!(actual instanceof Map.Entry)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, actual, " is not a Map.Entry.");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check both the key and value. We can always ignore the path here, this should only be
|
||||
// called from within a set comparison.
|
||||
ComparisonResult result;
|
||||
if ((result =
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
((Map.Entry<?, ?>) actual).getKey(), ((Map.Entry<?, ?>) expected).getKey(), null))
|
||||
.isFailure()) {
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((result =
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
((Map.Entry<?, ?>) actual).getValue(),
|
||||
((Map.Entry<?, ?>) expected).getValue(),
|
||||
null))
|
||||
.isFailure()) {
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Since we know that the objects are not equal and since any other types can not be expected
|
||||
// to contain DoNotCompare elements, this condition is always a failure.
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, actual, " is not equal to ", expected);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static ComparisonResult checkSetAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
Set<?> actual, Set<?> expected, String path, String type) {
|
||||
// Unfortunately, we can't just check to see whether one set "contains" all of the elements of
|
||||
// the other, as the cross database checks don't require strict equality. Instead we have to do
|
||||
// an N^2 comparison to search for an equivalent element.
|
||||
|
||||
// Objects in expected that aren't in actual. We use "identity sets" here and below because we
|
||||
// want to keep track of the _objects themselves_ rather than rely upon any overridable notion
|
||||
// of equality.
|
||||
Set<Object> missing = path != null ? Sets.newIdentityHashSet() : null;
|
||||
|
||||
// Objects from actual that have matching elements in expected.
|
||||
Set<Object> found = Sets.newIdentityHashSet();
|
||||
|
||||
// Build missing and found.
|
||||
for (Object expectedElem : expected) {
|
||||
boolean gotMatch = false;
|
||||
for (Object actualElem : actual) {
|
||||
if (!checkObjectAcrossDatabases(actualElem, expectedElem, null).isFailure()) {
|
||||
gotMatch = true;
|
||||
|
||||
// Add the element to the set of expected elements that were "found" in actual. If the
|
||||
// element matches multiple elements in "expected," we have a basic problem with this
|
||||
// kind of set that we'll want to know about.
|
||||
if (!found.add(actualElem)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(
|
||||
path, "element ", actualElem, " matches multiple elements in ", expected);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!gotMatch) {
|
||||
if (path == null) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure();
|
||||
}
|
||||
missing.add(expectedElem);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (path != null) {
|
||||
// Provide a detailed message consisting of any missing or unexpected items.
|
||||
|
||||
// Build a set of all objects in actual that don't have counterparts in expected.
|
||||
Set<Object> unexpected =
|
||||
actual.stream()
|
||||
.filter(actualElem -> !found.contains(actualElem))
|
||||
.collect(
|
||||
Collector.of(
|
||||
Sets::newIdentityHashSet,
|
||||
Set::add,
|
||||
(result, values) -> {
|
||||
result.addAll(values);
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}));
|
||||
|
||||
if (!missing.isEmpty() || !unexpected.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
String message = type + " does not contain the expected contents.";
|
||||
if (!missing.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
message += " It is missing: " + formatItems(missing.iterator());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!unexpected.isEmpty()) {
|
||||
message += " It contains additional elements: " + formatItems(unexpected.iterator());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, message);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// We just need to check if there were any objects in "actual" that were not in "expected"
|
||||
// (where "found" is a proxy for "expected").
|
||||
} else if (!found.containsAll(actual)) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static ComparisonResult checkListAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
Collection<?> actual, Collection<?> expected, @Nullable String path) {
|
||||
Iterator<?> actualIter = actual.iterator();
|
||||
Iterator<?> expectedIter = expected.iterator();
|
||||
int index = 0;
|
||||
while (actualIter.hasNext() && expectedIter.hasNext()) {
|
||||
Object actualItem = actualIter.next();
|
||||
Object expectedItem = expectedIter.next();
|
||||
ComparisonResult result =
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
actualItem, expectedItem, path != null ? path + "[" + index + "]" : null);
|
||||
if (result.isFailure()) {
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
++index;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (actualIter.hasNext()) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(
|
||||
path, "has additional items: ", formatItems(actualIter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (expectedIter.hasNext()) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, "missing items: ", formatItems(expectedIter));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Recursive helper for isEqualAcrossDatabases. */
|
||||
private static ComparisonResult checkImmutableAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
ImmutableObject actual, ImmutableObject expected, String path) {
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> actualFields = filterFields(actual, ImmutableObject.DoNotCompare.class);
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> expectedFields = filterFields(expected, ImmutableObject.DoNotCompare.class);
|
||||
|
||||
for (Map.Entry<Field, Object> entry : expectedFields.entrySet()) {
|
||||
if (!actualFields.containsKey(entry.getKey())) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(path, "is missing field ", entry.getKey().getName());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Verify that the field values are the same.
|
||||
Object expectedFieldValue = entry.getValue();
|
||||
Object actualFieldValue = actualFields.get(entry.getKey());
|
||||
ComparisonResult result =
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
actualFieldValue,
|
||||
expectedFieldValue,
|
||||
path != null ? path + "." + entry.getKey().getName() : null);
|
||||
if (result.isFailure()) {
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Check for fields in actual that are not in expected.
|
||||
for (Map.Entry<Field, Object> entry : actualFields.entrySet()) {
|
||||
if (!expectedFields.containsKey(entry.getKey())) {
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createFailure(
|
||||
path, "has additional field ", entry.getKey().getName());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return ComparisonResult.createSuccess();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private static String formatItems(Iterator<?> iter) {
|
||||
return Joiner.on(", ").join(iter);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Encapsulates success/failure result in recursive comparison with optional error string. */
|
||||
static class ComparisonResult {
|
||||
boolean succeeded;
|
||||
|
@ -412,7 +150,6 @@ public final class ImmutableObjectSubject extends Subject {
|
|||
// don't use ImmutableMap or a stream->collect model since we can have nulls
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> result = new LinkedHashMap<>();
|
||||
for (Map.Entry<Field, Object> entry : originalFields.entrySet()) {
|
||||
// TODO(b/203685960): filter by @DoNotCompare instead.
|
||||
if (entry.getKey().isAnnotationPresent(ImmutableObject.Insignificant.class)) {
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -422,28 +159,4 @@ public final class ImmutableObjectSubject extends Subject {
|
|||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/** Filter out fields with the given annotation. */
|
||||
private static Map<Field, Object> filterFields(
|
||||
ImmutableObject original, Class<? extends Annotation> annotation) {
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> originalFields = ModelUtils.getFieldValues(original);
|
||||
// don't use ImmutableMap or a stream->collect model since we can have nulls
|
||||
Map<Field, Object> result = new LinkedHashMap<>();
|
||||
for (Map.Entry<Field, Object> entry : originalFields.entrySet()) {
|
||||
// TODO(b/203685960): filter by @DoNotCompare instead.
|
||||
if (!entry.getKey().isAnnotationPresent(annotation)
|
||||
&& !entry.getKey().isAnnotationPresent(ImmutableObject.Insignificant.class)) {
|
||||
|
||||
// Perform any necessary substitutions.
|
||||
if (entry.getKey().isAnnotationPresent(ImmutableObject.EmptySetToNull.class)
|
||||
&& entry.getValue() != null
|
||||
&& ((Set<?>) entry.getValue()).isEmpty()) {
|
||||
result.put(entry.getKey(), null);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
result.put(entry.getKey(), entry.getValue());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return result;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -14,380 +14,17 @@
|
|||
|
||||
package google.registry.model;
|
||||
|
||||
import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;
|
||||
import static google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubject.ComparisonResult;
|
||||
import static google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubject.assertAboutImmutableObjects;
|
||||
import static google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubject.checkObjectAcrossDatabases;
|
||||
import static org.junit.Assert.assertThrows;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableList;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableMap;
|
||||
import com.google.common.collect.ImmutableSet;
|
||||
import java.util.regex.Pattern;
|
||||
import javax.annotation.Nullable;
|
||||
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
|
||||
|
||||
public class ImmutableObjectSubjectTest {
|
||||
|
||||
// Unique id to assign to the "ignored" field so that it always gets a unique value.
|
||||
private static int uniqueId = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_nulls() {
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects().that(null).isEqualAcrossDatabases(null);
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestAtom(null))
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestAtom(null));
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases(null, makeTestAtom("foo"), null).isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases(null, makeTestAtom("foo"), null).isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_equalObjects() {
|
||||
TestImmutableObject actual = makeTestObj();
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects().that(actual).isEqualAcrossDatabases(actual);
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects().that(actual).isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj());
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj(), makeTestObj(), null).isFailure())
|
||||
.isFalse();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_simpleFieldFailure() {
|
||||
AssertionError e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj().withStringField("bar")));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$TestImmutableObject.stringField:");
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj(), makeTestObj().withStringField(null), null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_nestedImmutableFailure() {
|
||||
// Repeat the null checks to verify that the attribute path is preserved.
|
||||
AssertionError e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj().withNested(null)));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$TestImmutableObject.nested:"
|
||||
+ " expected null, got TestImmutableObject");
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj().withNested(null))
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj()));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$TestImmutableObject.nested:"
|
||||
+ " expected TestImmutableObject");
|
||||
assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains("got null.");
|
||||
|
||||
// Test with a field difference.
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj().withNested(makeTestObj().withNested(null))));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$"
|
||||
+ "TestImmutableObject.nested.stringField:");
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj(), makeTestObj().withNested(null), null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_listFailure() {
|
||||
AssertionError e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj().withList(null)));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$" + "TestImmutableObject.list:");
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj().withList(ImmutableList.of(makeTestAtom("wack")))));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$"
|
||||
+ "TestImmutableObject.list[0].stringField:");
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withList(
|
||||
ImmutableList.of(
|
||||
makeTestAtom("baz"),
|
||||
makeTestAtom("bot"),
|
||||
makeTestAtom("boq")))));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$"
|
||||
+ "TestImmutableObject.list: missing items");
|
||||
// Make sure multiple additional items get formatted nicely.
|
||||
assertThat(e).hasMessageThat().contains("}, TestImmutableObject");
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj().withList(ImmutableList.of())));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$"
|
||||
+ "TestImmutableObject.list: has additional items");
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(),
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withList(ImmutableList.of(makeTestAtom("baz"), makeTestAtom("gauze"))),
|
||||
null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(), makeTestObj().withList(ImmutableList.of()), null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(),
|
||||
makeTestObj().withList(ImmutableList.of(makeTestAtom("gauze"))),
|
||||
null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_setFailure() {
|
||||
AssertionError e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj().withSet(null)));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$"
|
||||
+ "TestImmutableObject.set: expected null, got ");
|
||||
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj().withSet(ImmutableSet.of(makeTestAtom("jim")))));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.containsMatch(
|
||||
Pattern.compile(
|
||||
"Set does not contain the expected contents. "
|
||||
+ "It is missing: .*jim.* It contains additional elements: .*bob",
|
||||
Pattern.DOTALL));
|
||||
|
||||
// Trickery here to verify that multiple items that both match existing items in the set trigger
|
||||
// an error: we can add two of the same items because equality for purposes of the set includes
|
||||
// the DoNotCompare field.
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withSet(ImmutableSet.of(makeTestAtom("bob"), makeTestAtom("bob")))));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.containsMatch(
|
||||
Pattern.compile(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest\\$TestImmutableObject.set: "
|
||||
+ "element .*bob.* matches multiple elements in .*bob.*bob",
|
||||
Pattern.DOTALL));
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withSet(ImmutableSet.of(makeTestAtom("bob"), makeTestAtom("bob"))))
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj()));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.containsMatch(
|
||||
Pattern.compile(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest\\$TestImmutableObject.set: "
|
||||
+ "Set does not contain the expected contents. It contains additional "
|
||||
+ "elements: .*bob",
|
||||
Pattern.DOTALL));
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(),
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withSet(ImmutableSet.of(makeTestAtom("bob"), makeTestAtom("robert"))),
|
||||
null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(), makeTestObj().withSet(ImmutableSet.of()), null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(),
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withSet(ImmutableSet.of(makeTestAtom("bob"), makeTestAtom("bob"))),
|
||||
null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
// We don't test the case where actual's set contains multiple items matching the single item in
|
||||
// the expected set: that path is the same as the "additional contents" path.
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_mapFailure() {
|
||||
AssertionError e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestObj().withMap(null)));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$"
|
||||
+ "TestImmutableObject.map: expected null, got ");
|
||||
|
||||
e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(makeTestObj())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withMap(ImmutableMap.of(makeTestAtom("difk"), makeTestAtom("difv")))));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.containsMatch(
|
||||
Pattern.compile(
|
||||
"Map does not contain the expected contents. "
|
||||
+ "It is missing: .*difk.*difv.* It contains additional elements: .*key.*val",
|
||||
Pattern.DOTALL));
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(),
|
||||
makeTestObj()
|
||||
.withMap(
|
||||
ImmutableMap.of(
|
||||
makeTestAtom("key"), makeTestAtom("val"),
|
||||
makeTestAtom("otherk"), makeTestAtom("otherv"))),
|
||||
null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(
|
||||
makeTestObj(), makeTestObj().withMap(ImmutableMap.of()), null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_typeChecks() {
|
||||
ComparisonResult result = checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", makeTestObj(), "xxx");
|
||||
assertThat(result.getMessage()).isEqualTo("At xxx: blech is not an immutable object.");
|
||||
assertThat(result.isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", makeTestObj(), null).isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
result = checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", ImmutableMap.of(), "xxx");
|
||||
assertThat(result.getMessage()).isEqualTo("At xxx: blech is not a Map.");
|
||||
assertThat(result.isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", ImmutableMap.of(), null).isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
result = checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", ImmutableList.of(), "xxx");
|
||||
assertThat(result.getMessage()).isEqualTo("At xxx: blech is not a Collection.");
|
||||
assertThat(result.isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", ImmutableList.of(), null).isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
|
||||
for (ImmutableMap.Entry<String, String> entry : ImmutableMap.of("foo", "bar").entrySet()) {
|
||||
result = checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", entry, "xxx");
|
||||
assertThat(result.getMessage()).isEqualTo("At xxx: blech is not a Map.Entry.");
|
||||
assertThat(result.isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
assertThat(checkObjectAcrossDatabases("blech", entry, "xxx").isFailure()).isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testCrossDatabase_checkAdditionalFields() {
|
||||
AssertionError e =
|
||||
assertThrows(
|
||||
AssertionError.class,
|
||||
() ->
|
||||
assertAboutImmutableObjects()
|
||||
.that(DerivedImmutableObject.create())
|
||||
.isEqualAcrossDatabases(makeTestAtom(null)));
|
||||
assertThat(e)
|
||||
.hasMessageThat()
|
||||
.contains(
|
||||
"At google.registry.model.ImmutableObjectSubjectTest$DerivedImmutableObject: "
|
||||
+ "has additional field extraField");
|
||||
|
||||
assertThat(
|
||||
checkObjectAcrossDatabases(DerivedImmutableObject.create(), makeTestAtom(null), null)
|
||||
.isFailure())
|
||||
.isTrue();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@Test
|
||||
void testHasCorrectHashValue() {
|
||||
TestImmutableObject object = makeTestObj();
|
||||
|
@ -421,8 +58,6 @@ public class ImmutableObjectSubjectTest {
|
|||
ImmutableSet<TestImmutableObject> set;
|
||||
ImmutableMap<TestImmutableObject, TestImmutableObject> map;
|
||||
|
||||
@ImmutableObject.DoNotCompare int ignored;
|
||||
|
||||
static TestImmutableObject create(
|
||||
String stringField,
|
||||
TestImmutableObject nested,
|
||||
|
@ -435,7 +70,6 @@ public class ImmutableObjectSubjectTest {
|
|||
instance.list = list;
|
||||
instance.set = set;
|
||||
instance.map = map;
|
||||
instance.ignored = ++uniqueId;
|
||||
return instance;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Add table
Reference in a new issue